Thank you for your email. I will attempt to read all the post on the site, to get a clearer understanding of the site and of W and can navigate the site to somewhat of the sites expectations. Thanks brendan > Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 18:59:32 +0000 > From: jrstern@xxxxxxxxx > To: wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [Wittrs] Re: Does pain have a referent? > > --- In Wittrs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, kirby urner <kirby.urner@...> wrote: > > > > If you don't believe nominalism provides a suitable model for public > > life, then private life is easier to rescue from that dogma's sorry > > clutches (would be my take, using nominalism in a coherent namespace > > of my own invention that holds up Python as high class nominalist > > logic that deserves our respect -- but then doesn't masquerade as a > > "human grammar" (it's machine language, more Turing than > > Shakespeare)). > > Sure, you, and the Babylonians and Arabs who invented algebra, and Descartes > who invented modern usage of variables, and Church and lambda binding, and > Epicurus and his skepticism of essentials, and John Backus and Fortran, and > Grace Hopper and Cobol, and John McCarthy and symbolic processing, and a few > dozen others we could toss in there. > > Josh > > > > > WEB VIEW: http://tinyurl.com/ku7ga4 > TODAY: http://alturl.com/whcf > 3 DAYS: http://alturl.com/d9vz > 1 WEEK: http://alturl.com/yeza > GOOGLE: http://groups.google.com/group/Wittrs > YAHOO: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Wittrs/ > FREELIST: //www.freelists.org/archive/wittrs/09-2009 > _________________________________________________________________ Looking to move up the career ladder? Explore the endless opportunities here! http://a.ninemsn.com.au/b.aspx?URL=http%3A%2F%2Fmsn%2Eseek%2Eco%2Enz%2FID%5FSEEKNZMAIN%5FUSR%2FPages%2Falliance%5Fhomepage%2Eascx%3FComeFrom%3Dmsnnz%26tracking%3Dsk%3Atl%3Asknz%3Amsnnz%3A0%3Ahottag%3Aexplore&_t=757263783&_r=Seek_NZ_tagline&_m=EXT