Erik's recent photos of Thayer's gull reminded me that , If my memory is correct, the paper that resulted in it being elevated to specific status has been discredited or is at least highly suspicious. If that is correct, has anyone followed up with any published papers supporting (or refuting) the specific status of Thayer's gull? Greg Seegert, who is looking for definitive info showing that Thayer's is not just an east-west clinal variation of Iceland gull _______ See- http://www.ofo.ca/reportsandarticles/thayer.php for some perspective about the one species idea and then especially- http://aves.net/birdnews/litreview-xthgulls.htm Many now consider Thayer's as a good biological species that began to interbreed with glaucoides Iceland (also a good species) as it moved east, perhaps as the last glaciers receded. Kumlien's Gull, displaying a large degree of variation forms the now clinal, stable "hybrid swarm" with lighter birds found more to the east (more like glaucoides), especially on Baffin Is and darker birds as well as "good" Thayer's found due north of Wisconsin breeding in the far north of Hudson Bay (and elsewhere)- all forms freely interbreeding. We have many photos of these dark Kumlien's/light Thayer's from winter. See the evidence for 1,2 or 3 species- http://web2.puc.edu/Faculty/Floyd_Hayes/californiakumlieni/taxonomy.html The field work that would be needed to help answer this problem is considered to be nearly impossible to carry out considering the remoteness of many of these gull colonies and the inaccessibility of nests. For birders it can be totally futile to try to put a name on some birds that have both Kumlien's and Thayer's characters. Steve Howell has somewhat arbitrarily used the amount of dark pigment on the tip of p5- Kumlien's has none and Thayer's does. So perhaps the best approach is to stick to a criteria for a good Thayer's- everything else is a Kumlien's. It is often best for someone crazy enough to get into gulls to just study and photograph the wide range of variation of this complex that we see in the Midwest. John I Milwaukee Original Message ----- From: "Greg Seegert" <gseegert@xxxxxxxxx> To: wisbirdn@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: Wednesday, November 9, 2011 2:23:19 PM Subject: [wisb] Thayer's gull---no sightings Wisbirders Erik's recent photos of Thayer's gull reminded me that , If my memory is correct, the paper that resulted in it being elevated to specific status has been discredited or is at least highly suspicious. If that is correct, has anyone followed up with any published papers supporting (or refuting) the specific status of Thayer's gull? Greg Seegert, who is looking for definitive info showing that Thayer's is not just an east-west clinal variation of Iceland gull #################### You received this email because you are subscribed to the Wisconsin Birding Network (Wisbirdn). To UNSUBSCRIBE or SUBSCRIBE, use the Wisbirdn web interface at: //www.freelists.org/list/wisbirdn To set DIGEST or VACATION modes, use the Wisbirdn web interface at: //www.freelists.org/list/wisbirdn Visit Wisbirdn ARCHIVES at: //www.freelists.org/archives/wisbirdn #################### You received this email because you are subscribed to the Wisconsin Birding Network (Wisbirdn). To UNSUBSCRIBE or SUBSCRIBE, use the Wisbirdn web interface at: //www.freelists.org/list/wisbirdn To set DIGEST or VACATION modes, use the Wisbirdn web interface at: //www.freelists.org/list/wisbirdn Visit Wisbirdn ARCHIVES at: //www.freelists.org/archives/wisbirdn