[windows2000] Re: large number of files in folder, slow lan acces s

From: "Jeff Stockard" <JStockard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2002 13:53:36 -0400
You forgot your emoticons :)

-----Original Message-----
From: Charles R. Buchanan [mailto:crbgfblab@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]=20
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 1:48 PM
To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [windows2000] Re: large number of files in folder, slow lan
acces s


I got your girl bitch!

>-----Original Message-----
>From: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>[mailto:windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Mark Mucher
>Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 10:34 AM
>To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: [windows2000] Re: large number of files in folder, slow lan
>acces s
>
>
>
>Charles,
>
>You go, girl!
>
>Maybe now Frank will tell us where that statement came from.
>
>Mark
>
>
>Charles R. Buchanan wrote:
>
>>Quite frankly I think maybe, just maybe the guy either have
>experienced this
>>or what have you. Is it not true that AD can't be installed on FAT32?
>>Anyway, it's this elitist attitude that keeps a lot of people from
>>participating in forums such as this. Sure, it might be funny or
>intended as
>>such, but that's neither here nor there. It (IMO) basically said
>the guy is
>>full of sh!t. Maybe, maybe not, still I think it (the "pulled it out
his
>>arse") was uncalled for especially since the guy was trying to
>help someone.
>>Instead of a smarta** comment, maybe a correction or
>clarification probably
>>would have done much better at educating others who may not know these
>>things.
>>
>>No, I'm not a moderator, that's Jim's job, but I do have my opinion,
for
>>ever what it's worth.
>>
>>
>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>[mailto:windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of James Powers
>>>Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 5:21 AM
>>>To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>Subject: [windows2000] Re: large number of files in folder, slow lan
>>>acces s
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>The same place he read that ntfs is the only file system for nt and
2k
>>>"pulled it out his arse" magazine
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Aaron Dokey [mailto:adokey@xxxxxxxxxxxx]=3D20
>>>Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 8:15 AM
>>>To: 'windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
>>>Subject: [windows2000] Re: large number of files in folder, slow lan
>>>acces s
>>>
>>>
>>>Where did you read that NTFS is constrained to only 12MB/sec?
>>>
>>>-Aaron
>>>
>>>-----------------------
>>>Aaron Dokey - MIS
>>>Reid Tool Supply
>>>2265 Black Creek Rd.
>>>Muskegon, MI   49444=3D20
>>>(231) 777-3951
>>>(231) 767-3772 (Direct)
>>>-----------------------
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: FBohnsack@xxxxxxx [mailto:FBohnsack@xxxxxxx]
>>>Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 2:37 AM
>>>To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>Subject: [windows2000] Re: large number of files in folder, slow lan
>>>acces s
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>I would first check if there is a memory bottleneck before adding =3D
>>>memor=3D3D
>>>y. I
>>>have seen the same problems on W2k when creating large numbers of =3D
>>>files=3D3D
>>>and
>>>folders in the same structure. So this may be no solution either. I =
=3D
>>>don=3D3D
>>>'t
>>>think this is a hardware problem, I would expect the CPU and memory
to =3D
>>>=3D3D
>>>be
>>>only marginally utilized. NTFS has its limits and this seems to be
one =3D
>>>=3D3D
>>>of
>>>them. It's also not possible to get more than 12 MB/sec. throughput =
=3D
>>>fro=3D3D
>>>m
>>>one NTFS filesystem (=3D3D3Dpartition/volume) regardless of the
hardware
>>>underneath. So to sum it up, I don't think there is much you can do.
=3D
>>>Yo=3D3D
>>>u
>>>could make a test with W2k to see if there is a difference. But make
a =3D
>>>=3D3D
>>>test
>>>before actually migrating. NTFS is not the best filesystem out there,
=3D
>>>i=3D3D
>>>t's
>>>just the only available for NT/W2k.
>>>
>>>Cheers
>>>
>>>Frank
>>>
>>>
>>>Joe Shonk <JShonk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>Sent by: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>07.10.2002 08:12 MST
>>>Please respond to windows2000
>>>
>>>To: "'windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>cc:
>>>bcc:
>>>Subject: [windows2000] Re: large number of files in folder, slow lan
=3D
>>>ac=3D3D
>>>cess
>>>
>>>
>>>Add more memory, upgrade to W2k and turn on the index service.
>>>
>>>Joe
>>>
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Richard Hopper [mailto:Richard.Hopper@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>>>Sent: Monday, October 07, 2002 7:51 AM
>>>To: 'windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
>>>Subject: [windows2000] large number of files in folder, slow lan =3D
>>>access=3D3D
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Hi,
>>>I have a NT4 server which has a few folders with a fairly large
>>>number of files. 4000, or 12000 say. =3D3DA0Most of the files are
fairly =3D
>>>sm=3D3D
>>>all <
>>>16K. =3D3DA0 Browsing through these folders is painfully slow. =
=3D3DA0The
=3D
>>>serve=3D3D
>>>r is not
>>>heavily loaded by any means. =3D3DA0Is there anything I can do to
improve =3D
>>>t=3D3D
>>>his.
>>>The server is a 333Mhz PII with 256meg of ram. with over 180 megs of
=3D
>>>ra=3D3D
>>>m
>>>available.
>>>
>>>
>>>Cheers
>>>
>>>
>>>Richard
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
>mode or view archives use the below link.
>
>http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm
>
---
It's lights OUT for you viruses!
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.394 / Virus Database: 224 - Release Date: 10/3/2002



=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
mode or view archives use the below link.

http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm

==================================
To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
mode or view archives use the below link.

http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm
Follow-Ups:
- [windows2000] Re: large number of files in folder, slow lan acces s
  - From: Charles R. Buchanan
[windows2000] Re: large number of files in folder, slow lan acces s

Other related posts:
