[windows2000] Re: *.bat files under windows!
- From: "Jim Kenzig http://ThinHelp.com" <jkenzig@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2006 09:16:37 -0800 (PST)
Yeppers a .cmd file is going to execute twice as fast as a .bat file, be more
efficient.
JK
Ray at home <listray> wrote:
Is that what the difference is? I've been wondering for years! Thanks
Jim!
Ray at home
---------------------------------
From: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jim Kenzig
http://ThinHelp.com
Sent: Saturday, March 11, 2006 8:57 AM
To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [windows2000] Re: *.bat files under windows!
And instead of .bat make the file extension .cmd so it doesn't run in 16 bit
mode.
Jim Kenzig
Other related posts:
