[windows2000] Re: Windows 2000 and Legato Backups
- From: "Leitman, Ken" <ken.leitman@xxxxxxxx>
- To: <windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 16:34:41 -0400
We are using 6.13, don't know if that is the same version as you, or why
it should be different than 6.1. Did you look at block size and other
settings? The *nix boxes may set it wrong. You can tell sometimes if you
see the tape shuffling (going back and forth instead of just forward).
kl
-----Original Message-----
From: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stephen Taylor
Sent: Monday, April 19, 2004 4:15 AM
To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [windows2000] Re: Windows 2000 and Legato Backups
Hi Ken
We are using version 6.1
Stephen
"Leitman, Ken"
<ken.leitman@xxxxxxxx To:
windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> cc:
Sent by: Subject:
[windows2000] Re: Windows 2000 and Legato Backups
windows2000-bounce@fr
eelists.org
16/04/2004 14:58
Please respond to
windows2000
What version of Legato? Both Networker and Netbackup needed upgrades
here to handle W2K properly ( we are retiring legato, to much of an
annoyance, although Veritas has it's bad points too), kl
-----Original Message-----
From: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Stephen Taylor
Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 7:28 AM
To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [windows2000] Windows 2000 and Legato Backups
Hi There
Is anyone using Legato Networker as their Backup system?
We are having issues with backing up our a couple of our W2K SP3 & SP4
Servers.
The problem we are having is the actual backing up of the data from our
W2K file servers is running very slow.
The backup are controlled through a Unix server and written to tape in a
tape library.
Everything worked fine when the servers were NT4 servers but since
installing W2K the backups are slow.
As a consquence of this the file serving performance of the servers has
degraded considerably.
Even I'm starting to get annoyed with the performance.
Does anyone have any ideas as to why performance would be so slow?
Thanks in advance,
Stephen
-----------------------------------------
The information contained in this transmission may contain privileged and
confidential information and is intended only for the use of the person(s)
named above. If you are not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent
responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, any review,
dissemination, distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender
immediately by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
Please note that we do not accept account orders and/or instructions by e-mail,
and therefore will not be responsible for carrying out such orders and/or
instructions.
If you, as the intended recipient of this message, the purpose of which is to
inform and update our clients, prospects and consultants of developments
relating to our services and products, would not like to receive further e-mail
correspondence from the sender, please "reply" to the sender indicating your
wishes. In the U.S.: 1345 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10105.
********************************************************
This Weeks Sponsor StressedPuppy.com Games
Feeling stressed out? Check out our games to
relieve your stress.
http://www.StressedPuppy.com
********************************************************
To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
mode or view archives use the below link.
http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm
Other related posts:
