Ray, I suggest he's hosing you. If you look in Device Mangler under computer, a dual processor machine should show a multiprocessor HAL - otherwise it says uniprocessor and you need to replace the HAL. Another option is in Task Manager - view/CPU history/one graph per CPU. One or the other is wrong if it's a dual processor machine showing only one graph. That being said, I'm not familiar with "bridging" - I may learn something here! Re: licensing - I'd open them up and count the processors. I don't think that "bridging", if it exists, allows you to get around a per processor license. Another way to check is to look at the invoices. Let us know... HTH, Mark -----Original Message----- From: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Costanzo, Ray Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 12:17 PM To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [windows2000] Two processors as one Hi list, So, we got a few servers recently for some SQL stuff, and the guys who handle the hardware side of things say that these servers all have two processors but they're "bridged" or something to appear as one. In the task manager, only one processor shows up. I've never heard of "bridging" processors or anything like that. Is this guy just making stuff up, or is this something that can be done? The servers are Compaq Proliant DL380s, which I see can be purchased with two processors. http://h18004.www1.hp.com/products/servers/proliantdl380/description-g3. html What I'm getting at though, which I didn't really intend to ask here, is that if these servers are twin processor servers with them "bridged" or whatever, how many per-processor SQL licenses would we need? One or two? Thanks a lot, Ray at work ================================== To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation mode or view archives use the below link. http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm