[windows2000] Re: Server Room- Fire Suppression
- From: Daniel Ensor <densor@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 15:44:04 -0000
Not water!!! I think I'd rather burn. Halides are the best system to my
understanding as they suppress the oxygen but you don't get the gunk which
CO2 deposits which the fans love to suck up!
-----Original Message-----
From: Angus Macdonald [mailto:Angus.Macdonald@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 3:41 PM
To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [windows2000] Re: Server Room- Fire Suppression
I'd rather thave to clean up a fine powder than get servers that have been
flooded while powered to work again.
-----Original Message-----
From: Rob Combis [mailto:rcombis@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 13 November 2002 15:35
To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [windows2000] Server Room- Fire Suppression
This is off topic, but I have a quick question.
We are looking into getting a fire suppression system for our server =
room. The architect for the building recommends plain old water via =
sprinkler head, not any inert gas or anything. He says water is better =
because the inert gas leaves a fine powder behind that is hard to clean =
up. I can't believe that water can be any good. Anyone have any =
insights??
==================================
To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
mode or view archives use the below link.
http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm
==================================
To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
mode or view archives use the below link.
http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm
==================================
To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
mode or view archives use the below link.
http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm
Other related posts:
