[windows2000] Re: Poll
- From: "Sullivan, Glenn" <GSullivan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 15 Oct 2004 11:43:07 -0400
I can't even picture an office politics situation that would get into
the nitty-gritty of Printer IP Addressing, but maybe that's just my
small little office...
Glenn Sullivan, MCSE+I MCDBA
David Clark Company Inc.
________________________________
From: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bill Beckett
Posted At: Friday, October 15, 2004 11:14 AM
Posted To: Windows 2000
Conversation: [windows2000] Re: Poll
Subject: [windows2000] Re: Poll
Oh we already use reservation, I was just curious as to what the
majority does. We may have to switch to static ( long political story
there ) and I believe reservation to be the better method from a
troubleshooting standpoint.
-----Original Message-----
From: Sullivan, Glenn [mailto:GSullivan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, October 15, 2004 11:16 AM
To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [windows2000] Re: Poll
Reservation.
Static has no benefit over Reservations... it is even usually
more difficult to figure out how to navigate the printer menu's to set
it to static.
Print a config page (if the MAC isn't written anywhere) and set
up a reservation. Then set up a print queue with a new TCP/IP port to
that address, and you are done.
HTH,
Glenn Sullivan, MCSE+I MCDBA
David Clark Company Inc.
________________________________
From: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bill Beckett
Posted At: Friday, October 15, 2004 10:33 AM
Posted To: Windows 2000
Conversation: [windows2000] Poll
Subject: [windows2000] Poll
Just a quick poll on how you setup your printers via DHCP...do
you use static or use a reservation?
Other related posts:
