windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <> wrote on : > On Mon, 6 Feb 2006 10:01:41 +0100, "Sorin Srbu" <sorin.srbu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > took time to say the following: > > >> I run software raids in win2k/xp/win2k3 with same size-different brands >> harddrives. No problem there. If I'm building a software raid from scratch, >> I usually buy same size-same brand drives for practical purposes. > > I am assuming that the RAID is built in the MB so would that be > considered as hardware? No, they are connected to either the regular PATA-connectors on the mobo and/or the mobo has an extra hd-controller card w/o raid-abilities. I then use the windows disk manager to first convert the disks to "dynamic" disks and then create a striped volume set. Done. 8-) >> For Raid-0 it's true. But you don't have any security there. If one of the >> drives die, you loose the data on both. In practice and non-critical systems >> it's fine though, as it's really fast. I use this myself. With raid-0, the >> more drives you add, the faster it gets basically. > > It's my own personal computer and I got the vast majority of my > *important* stuff backed up. Then it shouldn't be a problem. >> Raid-0 *is* good, if you can backup stuff properly. If the data is important >> and you can't afford to loose, better look at raid 0+1 or similar. >> > The bigest thing is re-installing everything. :-( Oh, I almost forgot, > Will I still be able to dual (sometimes triple) boot? As in lunix and older windows9x/me? Then probably not, I don't know for sure though. Other members on this list may know better. The windows software raid is AFAIK only supported on win2k and newer. > Thanks! No prob. HTH. ***************************** New Site from The Kenzig Group! Windows Vista Links, list options and info are available at: http://www.VistaPop.com ***************************** To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation mode or view archives use the below link. http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm