*From*: Chris Berry <chris_berry-list-windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>*To*: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx*Date*: Thu, 30 Nov 2006 15:46:47 -0800

`Unfortunately I solved that using the byzantine method which doesn't
``usually count. I still don't really understand how to reduce the
``formula properly.
`

Ron Leach wrote:

Congrats!!! That is the correct answer. At least that's the answer in the back of the book. Thanks again to Mark for his insight. -----Original Message----- From: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Chris Berry Sent: Wednesday, November 29, 2006 4:15 PM To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [windows2000] Re: OT - Math Question Chris Berry wrote:but that's as close as I could get. Empirically the answer is x=7.8729,correction x=2.0634 (the other was for my simplified model not using e).

-- Chris Berry chris_berry@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Information Advisory Manager JM Associates

***************************** New Site from The Kenzig Group!

http://www.VistaPop.com

mode or view archives use the below link. http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm

**Follow-Ups**:**[windows2000] Re: OT - Math Question***From:*Moby

**References**:**[windows2000] Re: OT - Math Question***From:*Ron Leach

- » [windows2000] OT - Math Question
- » [windows2000] Re: OT - Math Question
- » [windows2000] Re: OT - Math Question
- » [windows2000] Re: OT - Math Question
- » [windows2000] Re: OT - Math Question
- » [windows2000] Re: OT - Math Question
- » [windows2000] Re: OT - Math Question
- » [windows2000] Re: OT - Math Question
- » [windows2000] Re: OT - Math Question
- » [windows2000] Re: OT - Math Question
- » [windows2000] Re: OT - Math Question
- » [windows2000] Re: OT - Math Question
- » [windows2000] Re: OT - Math Question
- » [windows2000] Re: OT - Math Question
- » [windows2000] Re: OT - Math Question