[windows2000] Re: (No Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 09:15:28 +0100
- From: "Dean Theophilou" <dino7@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 02:17:24 -0700
Thanks.
This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged.
Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee),
you may not use, copy, or disclose to anyone the message or any information
contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please
advise the sender by e-mail reply to dino7@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, and then delete
the message.
-----Original Message-----
From: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Angus Macdonald
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 1:09 AM
To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [windows2000] Re: (No Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2003 09:15:28 +0100
As long as you keep regular full backups, EFS is fine. The trouble arises if
you have to reinstall Windows, as the EFS keys will be overwritten and the
EFS volume will become useless. If you don't keep complete backups, uses PGP
instead.
-----Original Message-----
From: Dean Theophilou [mailto:dino7@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 18 October 2003 05:30
To: Windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [windows2000]
Does anyone have an opinion of Windows 2k?s EFS (Encrypting File System)
vs., let?s say, PGP? I?d appreciate any input. Thanks.
Dean Theophilou
This message contains information which may be confidential and privileged.
Unless you are the addressee (or authorized to receive for the addressee),
you may not use, copy, or disclose to anyone the message or any information
contained in the message. If you have received the message in error, please
advise the sender by e-mail reply to dino7@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, and then delete
the message.
Other related posts:
