[windows2000] Re: NIC TEAMING
- From: "Beckett, William \(Bill\)" <bill.beckett@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 07:48:26 -0400
Does anyone use NIC teaming for speed vs fault tolerance?
________________________________
From: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Leitman, Ken
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2006 9:14 AM
To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [windows2000] Re: NIC TEAMING
We switched to SFT recently as IBM servers have an issue with AFT. The
HP server work fine with both and we have been using AFT on HP for
almost 6 years.
Ken Leitman
http://winteldirections.blogspot.com/
________________________________
From: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gary
Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2006 12:04 PM
To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [windows2000] Re: NIC TEAMING
Works well, I have been using Proset for about a year in the Fault
tolerance configuration with no issue's.
Gary
-----Original Message-----
From: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Beckett, William
(Bill)
Sent: Sunday, July 02, 2006 8:14 AM
To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [windows2000] NIC TEAMING
Is anyone out there using the NIC teaming feature, specifically
with Intel Proset? If so, which setup are you using (ALB, SLA,AFT, etc)
and have you encountered any issues?
-----------------------------------------
The information contained in this transmission may be privileged and
confidential and is intended only for the use of the person(s) named
above. If you are not the intended recipient, or an employee or agent
responsible
for delivering this message to the intended recipient, any review,
dissemination,
distribution or duplication of this communication is strictly
prohibited. If you are
not the intended recipient, please contact the sender immediately by
reply e-mail
and destroy all copies of the original message. Please note that we do
not accept
account orders and/or instructions by e-mail, and therefore will not be
responsible
for carrying out such orders and/or instructions. If you, as the
intended recipient
of this message, the purpose of which is to inform and update our
clients, prospects
and consultants of developments relating to our services and products,
would not
like to receive further e-mail correspondence from the sender, please
"reply" to the
sender indicating your wishes. In the U.S.: 1345 Avenue of the Americas,
New York,
NY 10105.
Other related posts:
