[windows2000] Re: .NET 2003 vs Windows2000 (servers)
- From: Robert Funderburk <robfunderburk@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 05 Jan 2003 00:49:27 -0500
I have found .NET RC2 to be super stable, but then again, so is 2K
server. I haven't loaded any strange apps on it yet.
Charles R. Buchanan wrote:
>While installing the Standard Server today I noticed on one of the splash
>screens that M$ considers .NET way better than any W2K server OS. So I was
>wondering for those who have installed the .NET RC os'es, what is your
>opinion on this?
>
>While I realize that it's not fair to judge one OS that has been around
>longer against the new kids on the block, but just the first glance, try and
>so forth.
>
>
>---
>Ohio State Buckeyes - National Champions!
>Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
>Version: 6.0.435 / Virus Database: 244 - Release Date: 12/30/2002
>
>
>
>==================================
>To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
>mode or view archives use the below link.
>
>http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm
>
>
>
==================================
To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
mode or view archives use the below link.
http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm
Other related posts:
