At 11:10 AM 9/13/2002, you wrote: >As much as I love MS, I have to agree. I always refer to 2000 as >"Microsoft's last great operating system." When 2000 was created, they took >all the hardcoreness of NT that was sometimes hard to find and operate, and >made it very ergonomically brilliant. I don't think they knew what else to >do then, so they added some lame ass movie editor, an incredibly annoying >image viewer that likes to overtake everything, and made the interface look >like it was created by Crayola and then released it as a "completely new!" >OS. Whatever. can you be more specific in what hardcoreness is? i'm more fond of how nt operates compared to win2k, but i prefer the updated win2k gui. your gripes are something that are easily fixable...dont install it and configure explorer to act as the old explorer. i tend to think of the new interface as Bob Grown Up. my gripe on 2k/XP is the included computer mgmt console / mmc snapins. i hate it...i dont one everything to be in one interface, it _feels_ slow and inefficient. i prefer to have the option to have computer mgmt pieces (usrmgr / eventlog / etc) executed in their own program (like NT) rather than a snapin. ================================== To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation mode or view archives use the below link. http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm