[windows2000] Exchange installation/volumes
- From: "Condon, Mike" <M1C@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2004 09:11:18 -0500
I remember at one time it was recommended to install Exchange on a server
with a physically separate Windows system volume (preferably mirrored), then
have Exchange & the Information Store installed on another physically
separate set of drives (either mirrored or RAID 5, depending on the amount
of total storage required/planned for Exchange).
Is this still a recommended standard, or is it outdated considering the
advances in hardware performance?
********************************************************
This Weeks Sponsor StressedPuppy.com Games
Feeling stressed out? Check out our games to
relieve your stress.
http://www.StressedPuppy.com
********************************************************
To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
mode or view archives use the below link.
http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm
Other related posts:
