Your host vm (or hypervisor) should be 64 bit so you can have more than 4GB of usable ram in the box. Plus these chips have all that hardware support for VMs to speed things up. Running 32bit VMs does make the most sense. Tim Mangan Founder, TMurgent Technologies tmangan@xxxxxxxxxxxx (+1)781.492.0403 ---------------------------------------- Return-Path: <windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Received: from freelists-180.iquest.net [206.53.239.180] by mail7.hostek.com with SMTP; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 22:11:02 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 01FA37C46F7; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:10:49 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30513-07; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:10:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 5C5DF7C3D9A; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:10:48 -0500 (EST) Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list windows2000); Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:10:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id E38737C465C for <windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:10:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (turing.freelists.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 30484-04 for <windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:10:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from mail.lane34.com (lane34.com [69.41.238.114]) by turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 9A4677C35F5 for <windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:10:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from RayVista ([71.225.52.211]) by mail.lane34.com with MailEnable ESMTP; Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:10:31 -0500 X-SMSpamC: processed X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.2 (2007-07-23) on spam3.hostek.com from 10.10.12.7 at Tue, 27 Nov 2007 22:12:13 -0600 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=7.0 tests=DK_POLICY_SIGNSOME, HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RDNS_NONE autolearn=disabled version=3.2.2 X-Original-To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Delivered-To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx From: "Ray Costanzo" <ray@xxxxxxxxxx> To: <windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [windows2000] 32-bit virtual machines Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 23:10:38 -0500 Message-ID: <063d01c83174$a224b0a0$e66e11e0$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_063E_01C8314A.B94EA8A0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AcgxdKGn30mwGL+jQf6L2m0rSgZ2rw== Content-Language: en-us X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at localhost.localdomain X-archive-position: 17968 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0 Sender: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Errors-to: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx X-original-sender: ray@xxxxxxxxxx Precedence: normal Reply-to: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx List-help: <mailto:ecartis@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?Subject=help> List-unsubscribe: <windows2000-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?Subject=unsubscribe> List-software: Ecartis version 1.0.0 List-Id: windows2000 <windows2000.freelists.org> X-List-ID: windows2000 <windows2000.freelists.org> List-subscribe: <windows2000-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?Subject=subscribe> List-owner: <mailto:jimkenz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> List-post: <mailto:windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> List-archive: <//www.freelists.org/archives/windows2000> X-list: windows2000 X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at localhost.localdomain X-Rcpt-To: <tmangan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Hi list, My winter project this year is to rebuild my home network. I'm upgrading to a WS2003 domain from Windows 2000 (or I may venture into 2008 depending on when that comes out). I'm going to make use of virtualization as much as possible and anticipate having five or six VMs. I'm not a big fan of 64 bit OSes, so I want to run all 32 bit ones. When I build the machine that will host all the virtual machines, I'll want to get as much processing power as I can reasonably afford. It seems, however, that all the hardcore processors these days are 64 bit. Will this matter? Will I just be wasting money buying a 64 bit processor for all 32 bit OSes? Aside from the "you should run 64 bit OSes" responses, any thoughts on this? Thanks