I've been working my way through the Bilderberg reports, a useful chance
to think about the lives of the people (>90% men, BTW) who attended. I
have a template like the below, just changing XXX, YYY & the year to suit:
{{person
|wikipedia=
|image=
|birth_date=
|birth_place=
|death_date=
|death_place=
|constitutes=
}}
'''XXX''' was a panelist for the discussion about ''YYY'' at the [[1993
Bilderberg]].<ref
name=bb1993report>[[File:Bilderberg-Conference-Report-1993.pdf]]</ref>
{{SMWDocs}}
==References==
{{reflist}}
{{Stub}}
The "constitutes=" line gives me most pause for thought - the rest is
data entry. How to some up someone's life in a few words?... It can be
more than one entry, comma separated as usual. e.g "politician,
fraudster, pilot"
The person is added to the mentioned page, resulting in very long lists,
e.g. for https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Politician
Almost all these list pages are currently pretty bland, but they could
be expanded, like normal pages, of course. Reviewing the deep state
member classifications used so far, I see the following terms:
spook - people who are members of spy agencies, or as good as
deep politician - top level string pullers
There are at least 3 terms for mid level members of the deep state:
deep state operative
deep state actor
deep state functionary
Currently, these all redirect to
https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Deep_state_functionary
but I think it might be worth differentiating between them. What do you
think might be a good basis to differentiate between the different terms?
One way to discuss their different roles would be to use canonical
examples, e.g. deep politician == George H.W. Bush
Practically (e.g. from the perspective of someone who makes a WS page)
it needs to be fairly easy to distinguish between them. Would other
labels be helpful?
Robin
