Jack - About half of the job order's are suppressed in New York. It is decided as a matter of policy within each region. Paul ________________________________ From: Gannon, Jack [mailto:JGannon@xxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 10:49 AM To: Mason, Paul (LABOR); wiaattorneys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Suppressing name on employer job order Sensitivity: Private I have another Wagner-Peyser related issue. A local staff person took a job listing from an employer in which they were replacing their office manager but wanted to have some potential replacements lined up before terminating the current manager. As a result, they asked the staff person to withhold the name of the employer on the job order. She did this and any interested person then had to submit a resume through her. This resulted in some conflict within the office as other staff contended this could not be done - that the employer's name must be revealed to the job applicants. In years past, DOL had strict definitions of what constitutes a job opening and a referral. Of course the WP regs are much less detailed than they used to be on these sorts of issues, but I was wondering if anyone has had a similar question presented to them. It may come down to a policy issue rather than a legal one. Jack Gannon, Staff Attorney Indiana Department of Workforce Development 10 N. Senate Ave. Indianapolis, IN 46204 (317) 232-7482 jgannon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx This message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s) and may contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or exempt from disclosure under applicable laws. If you are not the intended recipient(s), you are notified that the dissemination, distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you receive this message in error, or are not the name recipient(s), please notify the sender at either the e-mail address or telephone number above and delete this e-mail from your computer. Receipt by anyone other than the named recipient(s) is not a waiver of any attorney-client, work product, or other applicable privilege. ________________________________ From: wiaattorneys-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:wiaattorneys-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mason, Paul (LABOR) Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 12:54 PM To: wiaattorneys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [wiaattorneys] Drug Testing Sensitivity: Private Has anyone dealt with the question of allowing employers to conduct drug tests at One-Stops? If so, does anyone have any policies or procedures on this issue? Any indemnification agreements? Paul Mason Associate Attorney State Office Campus Building 12, Room 509 Albany, NY 12240 phone: (518) 457-4380 fax: (518) 485-1819 paul.mason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:paul.mason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> This transmission may contain confidential or privileged information, which is intended for use by the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, dissemination, copying or distribution of this transmission or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately at the above address and delete the transmission and its attachments.