[wiaattorneys] Re: Suppressing name on employer job order

  • From: "Mason, Paul (LABOR)" <Paul.Mason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "Gannon, Jack" <JGannon@xxxxxxxxxx>, <wiaattorneys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 1 Sep 2005 13:27:07 -0400

Jack - About half of the job order's are suppressed in New York.  It is
decided as a matter of policy within each region.
Paul

________________________________

From: Gannon, Jack [mailto:JGannon@xxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, September 01, 2005 10:49 AM
To: Mason, Paul (LABOR); wiaattorneys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Suppressing name on employer job order
Sensitivity: Private



I have another Wagner-Peyser related issue.  A local staff person took a
job listing from an employer in which they were replacing their office
manager but wanted to have some potential replacements lined up before
terminating the current manager.  As a result, they asked the staff
person to withhold the name of the employer on the job order.  She did
this and any interested person then had to submit a resume through her.
This resulted in some conflict within the office as other staff
contended this could not be done - that the employer's name must be
revealed to the job applicants.  In years past, DOL had strict
definitions of what constitutes a job opening and a referral.  Of course
the WP regs are much less detailed than they used to be on these sorts
of issues, but I was wondering if anyone has had a similar question
presented to them.  It may come down to a policy issue rather than a
legal one.  

 

Jack Gannon, Staff Attorney

Indiana Department of Workforce Development

10 N. Senate Ave.

Indianapolis, IN 46204

(317) 232-7482

jgannon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

 

This message is confidential, intended only for the named recipient(s)
and may contain information that is privileged, attorney work product or
exempt from disclosure under applicable laws. If you are not the
intended recipient(s), you are notified that the dissemination,
distribution or copying of this message is strictly prohibited. If you
receive this message in error, or are not the name recipient(s), please
notify the sender at either the e-mail address or telephone number above
and delete this e-mail from your computer. Receipt by anyone other than
the named recipient(s) is not a waiver of any attorney-client, work
product, or other applicable privilege.

 

 

________________________________

From: wiaattorneys-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:wiaattorneys-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mason, Paul
(LABOR)
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2005 12:54 PM
To: wiaattorneys@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [wiaattorneys] Drug Testing
Sensitivity: Private

 

Has anyone dealt with the question of allowing employers to conduct drug
tests at One-Stops?  If so, does anyone have any policies or procedures
on this issue?  Any indemnification agreements?

 

Paul Mason
Associate Attorney
State Office Campus
Building 12, Room 509
Albany, NY  12240
phone: (518) 457-4380
fax:   (518) 485-1819
paul.mason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:paul.mason@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 

This transmission may contain confidential or privileged information,
which is intended for use by the individual or entity to whom it is
addressed.  If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any disclosure, dissemination, copying or distribution of
this transmission or its attachments is strictly prohibited.  If you
have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender
immediately at the above address and delete the transmission and its
attachments.

 

Other related posts: