Dominik Peklo wrote: > > The question should really be "Why NOT have a native UAC2 support?" That question is not hard to answer. Microsoft is driven by dollars. Every new feature they add represents a testing burden and 10 or 15-year support burden. It's a big commitment. Such a commitment has to be justified by a a business case that forecasts a corresponding increase in sales, and up to this point, no one has been able to present a convincing business case. Consumers just don't care. -- Tim Roberts, timr@xxxxxxxxx Providenza & Boekelheide, Inc. ****************** WDMAUDIODEV addresses: Post message: mailto:wdmaudiodev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subscribe: mailto:wdmaudiodev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe Unsubscribe: mailto:wdmaudiodev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe Moderator: mailto:wdmaudiodev-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx URL to WDMAUDIODEV page: http://www.wdmaudiodev.com/
