[wdmaudiodev] Re: The latest in acheiveable latencies using Windows?

  • From: Eugene Muzychenko <emuzychenko@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: Evert van der Poll <wdmaudiodev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2007 10:15:55 +0600

Hello Evert,

> I agree with you that 64 samples is probably the best latency you can
> achieve with audio devices and PCI hardware is the most likely candidate to
> achieve it with.

I'm wondering why Windows audio is SO slow. 1 GHz Pentium processor
performs near a billion of instructions during one millisecond. Due to
memory, let's say it will be 700 thousands. WHAT could Windows kernel
routines do to spend so much time?

Regards,
Eugene

******************

WDMAUDIODEV addresses:
Post message: mailto:wdmaudiodev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subscribe:    mailto:wdmaudiodev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=subscribe
Unsubscribe:  mailto:wdmaudiodev-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?subject=unsubscribe
Moderator:    mailto:wdmaudiodev-moderators@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

URL to WDMAUDIODEV page:
http://www.wdmaudiodev.com/

Other related posts: