[vicsireland] Re: Windows Media Player
- From: "Tony Sweeney" <tonysweeney1@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <vicsireland@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 16:03:22 +0100
Hi Flor Again!
Thanks for all that interesting info!
Could you let me know what version of WMP you use then and how do you find
it accessibility wise compared to other versions of WMP, say 9 or 10 for
example?
Tony.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Flor Lynch" <florlync@xxxxxx>
To: <vicsireland@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 2:16 AM
Subject: [vicsireland] Re: Accessible Windows Media Player
> Hi Tony,
>
> It seems to depend on what you want to actually do with the player. From
a
> straightforward, no-strings-attached, point of view, Winamp, despite its
> rather unorthodox structures, is the most accessible player of the Big
> Three - WMP, RealPlayer, and Winamp. (there are limitations, however,
when
> it comes to CD writing/burning in the free version of Winamp, that do not
> seem to apply to either WMP or RealPlayer.) (Subject to amendment, as i
> have not used players other than Windows Media for these purposes.)
>
> Also, consider trialling VUPlayer! I don't have a Web site for it.
another
> player you might consider trialling - same lack of knowledge applies! - is
> Foobar 2000. later versions of winamp are, or tend to work less well - or
> be more 'buggy' - than their predecessors. (Now, you want to bring on the
> Clare team? Good luck with all that!)
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Tony Sweeney" <tonysweeney1@xxxxxxxxxx>
> To: "vics" <vicsireland@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, June 02, 2008 1:51 AM
> Subject: [vicsireland] Accessible Windows Media Player
>
>
> Hi All,
> For a project that I'm involved in, could some one please let me know what
> is, in your opinion, the best Windows Media Player for downloading?
>
> There is a 11 version but I hear that 9 or 10 might be better
> accessibility-wise!
>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Tony.
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
