That would actually be good idea. To have something specific to be done "management"wise and so :) Sami Olmari On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Miika Pietila <mii@xxxxxx> wrote: > Should we have? > > > " > *Problem* > > You want to resolve internal conflicts, exercise democratic decision-making, > and discuss recent issues and future plans. > > > *Implementation* > > Have a regular meeting with possibly all members. Have an agenda and set > goals. Make people commit themselves to tasks. Write down minutes of the > meeting and post them on a mailing list and/or Wiki. Go for the only date > that works: once a week. Weird dates like “first full-moon after the third > Friday” will never work. Likewise doesn’t every other week or anything > similar. > > (Note from enki/metalab: every two weeks worked much better for us. having > meetings without progress to report or things to discuss is worse than no > meeting, because it attracts people who talk and deters people who are > action-oriented) (Note from Moem/Hack42: we concur. Bi-weekly meetings are > working fine for us.) > " > > http://hackerspaces.org/wiki/The_Plenum_Pattern >