Well, it seems that true county jurisdiction only goes out three miles, even though state / national jurisdiction goes further. In a sense there is no county "out there," say, 60 miles from shore, even if you are still "in" Virginia in some sense. So I have been conservative in counting and simply called those species "Virginia" birds and "pelagic" birds. Also, on some of the pelagic trips I've been on, I wasn't always sure what state I was in, much less what county (e.g. once out of Ocean City, MD, and once or twice out of Virginia Beach, VA). Of course, most (nearly all?) organized birding trips from Virginia Beach stay in Virginia waters, and we could agree to count all those Virginia pelagics in Virginia Beach, Northampton, or Accomack, as appropriate -- i.e. we could agree to list as if the county extended out 200 miles (similar to what they do in California). It's not so much that I am opposed to the idea as that I have simply been conservative to this point, not wanting to claim something on a county list that I haven't really seen in the relevant area. How's that? CMS ----- Original Message ----- From: "Larry R Lynch" <birder6@xxxxxxxx> To: <va_co_birding@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Sent: Saturday, January 08, 2005 3:40 PM Subject: [va_co_birding] Re: CBBT districts > Mike (and everybody else too), > > I read the California article, and it appears that they and the ABA use > the 200 nautical mile limit for counties. I am curious why you chose to > use the 3 mile limit. > > Larry > > > va_co_birding is hosted by FreeLists. To change your settings or unsubscribe, visit www.freelists.org To post to the list (subscribers only), send email to va_co_birding@xxxxxxxxxxxxx