Ok, Pinocchio!
=======================================
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Russell <ericprussell@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: uupretirees@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <uupretirees@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wed, Mar 17, 2021 2:23 pm
Subject: [uupretirees] Re: More reason to think Beijing's to blame for the
pandemic
#yiv0529375560 P {margin-top:0;margin-bottom:0;}Riiight. I only present facts
as facts when they are reality based. Can you say the same, Gung Din? Eric
From: uupretirees-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <uupretirees-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of hils. <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 2:14 PM
To: uupretirees@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <uupretirees@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [uupretirees] Re: More reason to think Beijing's to blame for the
pandemic I present opinions as opinions(nothing more) you seem to read a lot
more in to them whereas you try present your opinions as fact.
===============================================
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Russell <ericprussell@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: uupretirees@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <uupretirees@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wed, Mar 17, 2021 1:36 pm
Subject: [uupretirees] Re: More reason to think Beijing's to blame for the
pandemic
The point is that you treat anything in the Post as gospel. You carry water
for them and try to serve it up as vintage wine. Eric
From: uupretirees-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <uupretirees-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of hils. <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 1:20 PM
To: uupretirees@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <uupretirees@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [uupretirees] Re: More reason to think Beijing's to blame for the
pandemic The authori identifies his article as his opinion.so what's the point
point?==============================================
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Russell <ericprussell@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: uupretirees@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <uupretirees@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wed, Mar 17, 2021 1:10 pm
Subject: [uupretirees] Re: More reason to think Beijing's to blame for the
pandemic
Note that it's filed under opinion. Find a different cliche. Eric
From: uupretirees-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <uupretirees-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of hils. <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 12:46 PM
To: uupretirees@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <uupretirees@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [uupretirees] Re: More reason to think Beijing's to blame for the
pandemic Contains additional info. Still carrin water for China? Bob
Kasprak=====================================
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Russell <ericprussell@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: uupretirees@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <uupretirees@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wed, Mar 17, 2021 12:34 pm
Subject: [uupretirees] Re: More reason to think Beijing's to blame for the
pandemic
This is a rehash of their article from a few days ago. They must be running
out of fresh slanders. Eric
From: uupretirees-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <uupretirees-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of hils. <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 12:19 PM
To: uupretirees@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <uupretirees@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [uupretirees] More reason to think Beijing's to blame for the pandemic
-----Original Message-----
Another view on this pandemic(origin);
Bb Kasprak======================================================
I thought you'd be interested in this story from the New York Post.
More reason to think Beijing's to blame for the pandemic
https://nypost.com/2021/03/16/more-reason-to-think-beijings-to-blame-for-the-pandemic/?utm_source=email_sitebuttons&utm_medium=site%20buttons&utm_campaign=site%20buttons
