Hello Nene et al,
Thank you for this.
This game deserved a bit of attention. There's some nice touches by you and
it's an impressive refutation of an appalling display by an engine. In fact
it's a model example of how to beat a low-rated opponent who fails to both
develop properly and to castle.
Some things I didn't mention were that your King position was never disturbed,
and the board-wide domination by your pieces at the end is a great feature to
be contrasted with White's lack of moves. The impressive bit is that it's all
done in a mere 25 moves.
Just another factor to take into consideration. How does the engine feel about
all this? Joking aside, how would a human feel if they had just played that
game as White and saw my notes? Interesting to speculate, but as we know
Stockfish has higher levels of play. Humans can aspire to higher levels and I'm
just trying to help you all on the way.
Regards,
Tyson
On 22 March 2021 at 05:19 Nene <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear Tyson:
I thanked you very much to your analysis of my game.
With your advice, I learned to slow down and think a bit of my position.
I'm sorry that I made you work hard on this game, bless your heart!
Regards,
Nene
