> "Integration" is just a meaningless buzzword to me. What does the UI > (in UAE-0.8.27, not E-UAE) lack? > Well, I have completely stopped using original UAE as soon as I have > downloaded first E-UAE version, so I cannot really tell what the > latest (not E-)UAE GUI lacks. And if it is still based on long > obsolete GTK+ 1.x, that means it would be as easy to get it working on > my system, as running SiagOffice on it... By integration I mean KDE > look and feel, with KDE usability rules conformance, ability to use > KIOSlaves as regular filesystems, KDE session persistency support, > etc. I don't want to write all the details, this list would be really > long :) Aye, and All I Want For Christmas Is A Dukla Prague Away Kit. I use E-UAE on KDE4 here and it adopts the look and feel of a KDE app (well, the only things I can tell by this is that the config window adopts my KDE theme). There are a number of methods for tuning GTK apps to have a KDE theme, and it has nothing to do with the actual application. The rest I couldn't care about. KIOSlaves as an FS? Where's the requirement for that? Boot (E)-UAE into workbench and fanny aboot, or fire up an ADF to play a game. It's an Amiga emulator. My A1200 can't use KIOSlaves. Why should the emulator? It emulates a brilliant but old machine, and if it was a case of the devs spending time pfaffing about with integration for a specific DE on a small (but significant) OS, or spending time improving the actual emulation of the original machine, I know where I'd rather time was spent. I still run e-uae from a konsole command line. I'm perfectly happy with whatever version of UAE accurately emulating an Amiga, and not masquerading as a modern integrated application into an obscure desktop environment (albeit one that I've been using for ages). It is what it is. Live with it. /me rant mode off Jonathan