[tor] Re: FDCServers (Fwd: Re: 1Gbit Hosting in EU)

  • From: Griffin Boyce <griffinboyce@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: torservers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2011 01:14:39 -0500

That seems fairly reasonable, but I'm curious as to how they define
"repeated abuses."  Seems like it may not be a great fit for Tor exit nodes,
but could be wrong.


On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 11:01 PM, Moritz Bartl <moritz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: Re: [#266369] 1Gbit Hosting in EU
> Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2011 21:51:32 -0600
> From: support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Hello Moritz,
> We cannot provide you SWIP as we already use RWHOIS, so that means that
> most abuse reports will continue be sent to our abuse e-mail. We
> actually have no problem with that, as we automatically forward them to
> our downstream clients, as long as abuse reports are *properly* handled
> and there are no repeated abuses.
> We do not restrict or forbid any specific type of legit services, as
> long as our AUP/TOS is not violated. However, you may be interested
> about the following since you expect abuse reports:
> - Abuse reports should be handled within 24 hours, providing us detailed
> information of the actions you've taken to stop abuse and avoid
> re-occurrence.
> - Our AUP/TOS, that you agree during signup, clearly states
> responsibilities (TOS section #16). In short, you're full responsible
> for any content hosted on your server or traffic passed through your
> server, so any claims for lack of responsibility will not be accepted
> and will be subject of service disconnection due to mishandled abuse
> report.
> - Template responses are not really appreciated, we need you to take
> real actions and stop abuses
> - Repeated abuses may result to service suspension / termination
> Please keep us informed if you have any further questions.
> Thank you.
> --
> Network Security Administrator

Be the change you want to see in the world.
~Mahatma Gandhi

Other related posts: