Not to worry, the photo still appears under Acleris forbesana! http://mothphotographersgroup.msstate.edu/species.php?hodges=3525 Hugh On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 6:14 PM, Diana Stock-Prescott < diana.stockprescott@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Hummmm....It wasn't me...I swear ........... There are only 3 photos in > that set now the last I looked and there were 4. I looked at it for a while > and it looked to be the exact same photo. > > Diana Stock -Prescott > Knox Co, TN > > > > > On May 16, 2011, at 3:37 PM, Hugh McGuinness wrote: > > Where'd it get put? I thought it belongs to forbesana. > > Hugh > > On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Diana Stock-Prescott < > diana.stockprescott@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Seems the photo in 3523 is gone already. Boy Hugh...yer good. Take care. >> >> Diana Stock -Prescott >> Knox Co, TN >> >> >> >> >> On May 16, 2011, at 2:32 PM, Hugh McGuinness wrote: >> >> I notified Bob Patterson of the issue. >> >> Hugh >> >> On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 10:47 AM, kjchilds <kjchilds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >>> Here's a prime example of why some ID's made by using MPG must be taken >>> with a grain or salt. Look at the pics of 3523 and 3525. :-) >>> >>> http://mothphotographersgroup.msstate.edu/slow.php?plate=9&sort=h >>> >>> Ken Childs >>> Henderson, TN >>> Chester County >>> >>> http://www.finishflagfarms.com >>> >>> >>> >> >> > >