[tn-moths] Re: BAMONA records
- From: kjchilds <kjchilds@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: tn-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 14:56:56 -0800 (PST)
I think I'll suggest that if possible, they leave the 'Organism Type' blank so
you have to make a selection.
Ken Childs
Henderson, TN
Chester County
________________________________
From: Jean Obrist <innisfreehorses@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: tn-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tue, January 18, 2011 1:12:25 PM
Subject: [tn-moths] Re: BAMONA records
That is an easy mistake to make; the default is "butterfly."
When uploading pix to BAMONA, do NOT have a number sign (#) in the file name.
They can't view the picture.
I like the user-friendly BAMONA site. If you don't want to scroll down the
drop-down menus, just start typing the state or county.... it will go to that
one. For TN, hit ENTER T ENTER, and no scrolling is necessary. (with cursor
anywhere on the blank box..... doesn't have to be on the down arrow)
Jean Obrist
----- Original Message -----
>From: Steve Stedman
>To: tn-moths@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Cc: Lotts, Kelly
>Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2011 9:20 AM
>Subject: [tn-moths] Re: BAMONA records
>
>
>Hi Ken,
>
>One of your Chester County moth submissions was directed to me instead of
>Jason Roberts quite recently, I assume inadvertently (perhaps you clicked
>on
>butterfly instead of moth near the top of the page?). The moth is quite
>elongated and has two projections sticking forward from the head. The only
>written detail is that there is a note saying it was attracted to a black
>light.
>
>I don't think there is anything I can do with it except reject it, but I am
>not sure if that action will effect the way it is later handled if you
>resubmit as a moth.
>
>Am copying Kelly Lotts on this.
>
>Steve
>
>
>----- Original Message -----
>>From: kjchilds
>>To: TN Moths
>>Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2011 11:38 AM
>>Subject: [tn-moths] BAMONA records
>>
>>
>>I contacted Jason Roberts about the records I've submitted to him in the
>>past year or so and he said BAMONA has them and it's just a matter of
>>getting them entered. I'm guessing these will have the same problem as
>>the
>>last batches of butterfly records that Steve Stedman sent in....they'll
>>show on the checklists but not on the maps because I didn't supply
>>latlong
>>coordinates.
>>
>>I've been entering records and have been concentrating on 2009 and
>>unidentified moths from 2010. So far, 6 new 2009 records have been ID'd
>>and
>>accepted for Chester County.
>>
>>
>> Ken Childs
>>Henderson, TN
>>Chester County
>>
>>http://www.finishflagfarms.com
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Other related posts:
