I have seen some of the photos and I do not think the hood is at all inconsistent with a Bonaparte's; keep in mind that Bonaparte's are molting this time of year also. That said, it is also not inconsistent with a Common Black-headed and the photos I saw aren't sufficient to conclude one way or the other. The report is intriguing and Jimmy's notes about size and shape are certainly consistent of the ID as Black-headed. I also heard from one observer who referenced a reddish bill, which would not be consistent with Bonaparte's. But, I also got a second-hand report that an observer saw the bird in flight and did not see dark under the primaries, which is a major strike against Black-headed if in fact that is the case (although it can be surprisingly hard to see depending on lighting conditions and viewing angle). Hopefully folks will re-find it today and get better looks and photos to resolve the issue. With decent looks, it should be fairly straightforward ID. Chris Sloan Nashville, TN http://www.chrissloanphotography.com On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 9:53 AM, <TenacBirder@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Possible Black-headed Gull > Parksville Lake, Polk co., TN > > Let me preface by saying I am not a Gull expert. Until Saturday 11 April, > 2014 I have never seen a Black-headed Gull nor a Franklin's Gull. I have > some experience with Bonaparte's Gull in winter in Chattanooga. I kid a > lot by saying things like "you can take my opinion and $1.25 and buy a cup > of coffee at most convenience stores." > > While studying the gull for more than 20 minutes I couldn't decide if I > was seeing a Black-headed Gull or a Franklin's Gull. I had basically ruled > out Franklin's because I could never see the white bands in the tail of > this bird. Laughing Gull was immediately ruled out because the black hood > didn't look right. I was really leaning toward Black-headed Gull. > > I received a phone call from someone whom I respect immensly in the > Chattanooga birding community. She said another well respected bird > authority in our area thought the gull was a Bonaparte's...with all due > respect, my first thoughts were: you gotta be kidding me! I had never ever > considered this gull as a Bonaparte's. > > What I saw: > 1- This was a rather large gull, when a crow walked behind it the crow was > about a heads height taller than the gull. > 2- When a Killdeer walked in front of the gull it was dwarfted. I would > consider the size comparasion similiar to a Rock Pigeon and a small warbler. > 3- The overall jizz of the bird seemed wrong for a Bony. > 4- The dark hood was not consistent with what I might have expected for a > Bony. (to short coming up the back of the head) > 5- The distance from the feet on the ground up to the body of the bird was > greater i.e. the legs seemed a bit longer. > 6- The bill seemed massive. On a Bonaparte's Gull I would have expected a > small black pointed bird like bill. ( just from my prospective, I would > suggest a bill comparasion between a downy and a Hairy Woodpecker. This > bill was like a hairy's i.e. size only no correlation to shape intended.) > > What I didn't see was I never saw the bird fly so I never got a look at > it's outstretched wings! AND the distance was a disadvantage (2,000 + > feet) when viewed through my 20x60, 77mm Bausch & Lomb spotting scope. > > I hope no one takes offense. I am generally not someone who will state an > opinion early. I tend to wait back until someone else makes a call > and then I start to work back to form my own conclusions. > > Please, anyone who saw this gull come forward and state your opinions. > I'd really like to know what you think... > > Jimmy Wilkerson > Hixson, Hamilton co., TN >