[tinwhiskers] Re: R: Re: New study on coating to mitigate whiskers

  • From: "Ron Southworth" <southworthrg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <tinwhiskers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 01:51:23 +1000

Thanks Judy

 

Ron Southworth

 

  _____  

From: tinwhiskers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:tinwhiskers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Little, Judy W (EHCOE)
Sent: Tuesday, 19 May 2009 1:35 AM
To: tinwhiskers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [tinwhiskers] Re: R: Re: New study on coating to mitigate whiskers

 

Denny,

 

Have you seen the wonderful video lessons in observing whiskers on the NASA Tin 
Whisker website?  If not, just go to:

 

http://nepp.nasa.gov/whisker/video/inspection/index.html

 

 

Judy Little

Honeywell, Clearwater, Florida

 

 

 

  _____  

From: tinwhiskers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
[mailto:tinwhiskers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Fritz, Dennis D.
Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2009 20:16
To: tinwhiskers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [tinwhiskers] R: Re: New study on coating to mitigate whiskers

We will have that capability, in addition to several versions of ring lights, 
fiber-optic "goose neck" lights, etc.   Seems to me that the "shine' or the 
reflection off the whisker is important.  I have the JEDEC spec.  

 

Denny

 

  _____  

From: tinwhiskers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Gabriele Sala
Sent: Sat 5/16/2009 5:45 AM
To: tinwhiskers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [tinwhiskers] R: Re: New study on coating to mitigate whiskers

 

Hi Denny,

 

Here (from JEDEC  Std. 22-A121A )  you can find some help.

 

In my experience  Optical Stereo from 40X to 150X  is good enough, it depends 
how deep you want to investigate.

 

You must be careful when handling boards because whiskers are very fragile

 

Just my 2 € ‘ cents

 

Best Regards

 

Gabriele Sala

 

CT-91  

 

--------------------

 

From the free download JEDEC Standards  
http://www.jedec.org/download/default.cfm

 

Look for 

JEDEC Standard No. 22-A121A

Test Method for Measuring Whisker Growth on Tin and Tin Alloy Surface Finishes

 (Revision of JESD22-A121.01, December 2005)

Last  level JULY 2008

 

Page 3

 

4.3 Optical stereomicroscope (Optional)

Optical stereomicroscope with adequate lighting capable of 50X to 150X 
magnification and capable

of detecting whiskers with a minimum length of 10 microns, per Annex B. If tin 
whiskers are

measured with an optical system, then the system must have a stage that is able 
to move in three

dimensions and rotate, such that whiskers can be positioned perpendicular to 
the viewing direction

for measurement.

 

4.4 Optical microscope (Optional)

Optical microscope with adequate lighting capable of 100X to 300X magnification 
and capable of

measuring whiskers with a minimum length of 10 microns, per Annex B. For tin 
whisker

measurements, the optical system must have a stage that is able to move in 
three dimensions and

rotate, such that whiskers can be positioned perpendicular to the viewing 
direction for

measurement.

 

4.5 Scanning electron microscope

Scanning electron microscope (SEM) capable of at least 250X magnification. An 
SEM fitted with

an X-ray detector is recommended for elemental identification.

 

 

 

 

 

 

From:  <mailto:tinwhiskers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
tinwhiskers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [ <mailto:tinwhiskers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx?> 
mailto:tinwhiskers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Fritz, Dennis D.
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 11:41 AM
To:  <mailto:tinwhiskers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> tinwhiskers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;  
<mailto:tinwhiskers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> tinwhiskers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [tinwhiskers] Re: New study on coating to mitigate whiskers

 

What is your whiskers inspection methodology?  

 

I am getting ready to do a study with Purdue undergraduate interns (who work 
for a VERY attractive price for our program).  We will determine both the 
extent of whiskers growth on commercial boards - scrap cell phones and laptops, 
and the ease of measurement by "semi-skilled" operators.  We will be using 
optical microscope, enhanced digital microscope, and simple SEM.  

 

Can you share your proceedures?

 

Denny Fritz

SAIC - Merrillville, IN

 

  _____  

From:  <mailto:tinwhiskers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
tinwhiskers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behal f of Jim Bunn
Sent: Fri 5/15/2009 10:55 AM
To:  <mailto:tinwhiskers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> tinwhiskers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [tinwhiskers] Re: New study on coating to mitigate whiskers

I think they are saying it works if the thickness is at least 2mils. Or maybe 
that the coating is better than nothing.

We have a lot of uncoated stuff out there running a test right now. And it's 
pretty comprensive considering the voltage levels that we are using in the 
PCUs. I'm suprised that we have not had some kind of problem.

________________________________

From:  <mailto:tinwhiskers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
tinwhiskers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Pedro Tort
Sent: Thu 5/14/2009 7:48 AM
To:  <mailto:tinwhiskers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> tinwhiskers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [tinwhiskers] New study on coating to mitigate whiskers



The National Physics Laboratory in UK has undertaken a study on the capability 
of different coatings to mitigate tin whiskers growth. The results of this 
investigation reinforces the findings of Jay Bruse and Dr. Henning Leidecker 
who back in 2007 found the Uralane 5750 Polyurethane was an effective 
mitigation strategy for tin whiskers provided the nominal coating thickness was 
2mils.



I quote from the first issue of the NPL Electronics Interconnection Newsletter:



"The use=2 0of conformal coatings is seen as the only practical means of 
controlling whisker growths shorting adjacent conductors on a PCB. NPL has 
studied three types of coating, to assess their effectiveness for inhibiting 
whisker growth.

Two coatings, polyurethane and paraxylene both were found to reduce the growth 
of whiskers for up to 150 days of testing, compared with failure of 14 days for 
uncoated samples. The acrylic coating was found not to perform as well as the 
others in parallel tests. All coatings failed to provide sufficient protection 
in areas of insufficient coating coverage, at corners and sides of the test 
samples."





Pedro Tort
Quality Manager

DigiProces, S.A.
Solsones, 87 - P.I. Pla de la Bruguera
P.O. Box 127
E-08211 CASTELLAR DEL VALLES
TEL. +34 937 142 132
FAX. +34 937 142 072
 <http://www.digiproces.com/> www.digiproces.com






This email and any files contained therein is confidential and may contain 
privileged information.  If you are not the named addressee(s) or you have 
otherwise received this in error, you should not distribute or copy this e-mail 
or use any of its content for any purpose. Please notify the sender immediately 
by e-mail if you have received this e-mail in error and delete it from your 
system

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.329 / Virus Database: 270.12.30/2115 - Release Date: 05/14/09 
17:54:00

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.329 / Virus Database: 270.12.32/2117 - Release Date: 05/17/09 
16:58:00


Other related posts: