[tinwhiskers] Re: [LF] FW: [SMART] Very useful RoHS review conference report

  • From: "Fritz, Dennis D." <DENNIS.D.FRITZ@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: <tinwhiskers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 18:08:05 -0500

Andrew.  
 
I believe Enthone (Cookson) acquired at least the technology, if not the whole 
company.  
 
http://www.enthone.com/pwb/index.aspx#FinalFinishes(HASLAlternatives)
 
There is a small spelling difference as it seems to me Florida CirTech used the 
name you give when they had the product for US distribution.  I cannot vouch 
for anything about whisker free, quoting from the  from the 2005 JEDEC/IPC 
mitigation guideline - JP002:
 

5.10.1 Immersion Tin

 

Immersion tin is a chemical displacement process that results in a relatively 
thin (<40 micro-inches or 1 µm) and stress free tin film.  Immersion tin's 
primary purpose as a surface finish for PCB applications, is solderability 
protection for the underlying copper basis metal. 

 

As previously mentioned above, a potentially significant source for whisker 
formation are stresses induced from the formation of Cu6Sn5 intermetallic 
compounds (IMCs). While whisker formation is a concern, the primary concern is 
migration of the IMCs through the deposit and subsequent oxidation at the 
surface, thus rendering the deposit non-solderable. To this end it is 
imperative that the specification for a minimum deposit thickness of 1 micron 
be recommended.  The thicker deposit improves shelf life, as a significant 
layer through which the IMCs must travel before solderability is impaired. [55]

 

The use of annealing procedures of 150 °C for 1 hour is not practical for 
printed circuit boards due to the potential negative impact of this temperature 
on warp & twist characteristics. 

 

Whiskers have been grown on immersion tin conductive features  To date, these 
whiskers have appeared at ambient conditions with time and not as a result of 
exposure to heat, vacuum, pressure, humidity or bias voltage [55]. This would 
seem to indicate that the primary source is Cu6Sn5 migration stress.  Whisker 
length has been reported to be significant in vias, with lengths measured at 
150 microns, see Figure 4.  Whiskers of much smaller length have been recorded 
growing off the edge of surface mount (SMT) component pads, as well [55].  

  

Figure 4: Whisker in an Immersion Tin Plated 0.46 microns (0.018 in) Diameter 
Via Hole (picture in original)

 

Immersion tin is a suitable minimum risk selection that has been successfully 
used by some companies in below gigahertz frequency applications. It is a 
potentially viable lead-free finish option for some PCB applications.

 

From a mitigation viewpoint, there are several options that should be reviewed 
if assembling a PWB with an Immersion Tin surface finish. The first option 
should be to ensure that all surfaces plated with tin be soldered, including 
vias. The consumption of the deposit as a function of soldering will all but 
eliminate any potential for whisker growth [55].  Where it is not possible to 
solder all vias, the use of hole-fill materials should be investigated. For 
vias used as test points, the use of conductive hole-fill material that is 
subsequently plated over with copper/immersion tin (considered at this stage a 
round SMT pad) and then soldered, will help mitigate whisker formation but 
still provide test point capability.

 
Denny Fritz
SAIC, Inc. 

________________________________

From: tinwhiskers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Andrew Glass
Sent: Tue 1/26/2010 5:40 PM
To: Bob Landman
Subject: [tinwhiskers] Re: [LF] FW: [SMART] Very useful RoHS review conference 
report



Hello Bob,

Really appreciate all the information Thanks.

Has anyone checked into OMICRON/TIN.
As a manufacturer of PCBoards I ran into this product
some years ago. The chemist said it will not whisker.

--
THANKS
Andrew Glass
AGCO Inc.
500 Rampart Range Road
Woodland Park Co. 80863
1-719-687-6875
FAX 1-719-687-6880
Andy@xxxxxxxxxx

Tuesday, January 26, 2010, 2:32:10 PM, you wrote:
> Sadly Nigel,

> The resulting RoHS legislation says otherwise.  I don't think
> namecalling does any good.  I'm of European heritage (mum was
> Canadian, fathers family was Romanian).  The problem is a problem
> with humans in general, and politicians in particular (of all
> parties).  To quote the Bard, the fault lies with ourselves.

> Clearly the science is presently on the side of lead.  It appears
> thus far not to matter.  No-one seems to offer a good explanation as
> to why that is so.

> Kindest regards,

> Bob Landman
> H&L Instruments


> On Jan 26, 2010, at 9:58 AM, Nigel Burtt <njb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> Perhaps perjoratively referring to those disagreed with as "lefties"
>> and "loonies"
>> might be why the valid opinions are ignored should you ever care to
>> share them with people who can actually use the information to change
>> things.
>>
>> And as a point of fact, the right of the political spectrum in the EU
>> has always held the majority in the EP
>>
>> < http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:EP_Groups_1979-2009.png >
>>
>> ---
>> ---
>> ---
>> ---
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Leadfee Mail List provided as a service by IPC using LISTSERV 1.8d To
>> unsubscribe, send a message to LISTSERV@xxxxxxx with following text in
>> the BODY (NOT the subject field): SIGNOFF Leadfree To temporarily
>> stop/(start) delivery of Leadree for vacation breaks
>> send: SET Leadfree NOMAIL/(MAIL)
>> Search previous postings at: http://listserv.ipc.org/archives Please
>> visit IPC web site http://www.ipc.org/contentpage.asp?Pageid=4.3.16
>>  for additional information, or contact Keach Sasamori at
>> sasako@xxxxxxx  or 847-615-7100 ext.2815
>> ---
>> ---
>> ---
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>





Other related posts: