The following e-mail messages about tin whiskers were posted to the "LeadFree" e-mail forum of the IPC. There is some good data and literature refererences here, so I compiled the sequence and post them here to the Whiskers Forum. This started from an inquiry about the current cost of RoHS around the world - a figure of $32 Billion and climbing $4-5 each year. Denny ________________________________ Subject: Whiskers info posted on IPC LeadFree forum. > From: Steve Gregory [mailto:SGregory@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Monday, April 21, 2008 5:22 PM > To: (Leadfree Electronics Assembly Forum); SCHMIDT, WOLF-DIETER - PFHO > Subject: RE: [LF] The Cost of EU RoHS: $32.7B > > > Hi Wolf! > > Here's a link you might want to look at: > > http://nepp.nasa.gov/whisker/failures/index.htm > > Steve *********************************************************** Hello Steve, in between I've read most of the available reports related to the your link. Nearly all reports point out that the tin cover on mechanical parts have been the base for tin whisker growth: << DirecTV 3 ...... Boeing 601-model satellite ...... being caused by the growth of metal filaments in a relay ..... << >> Galaxy VII Lost ..... failures in Boeing 601 satellites........ tin whiskers grow in the vacuum of space on internal tin-plated relay latching switches..... << (a lot of reports on the 601 - bad luck for Boeing products) >> report by Gordon Davy1, Northrop Grumman Electronic Systems, Baltimore, MD: "Relay Failure Caused by Tin Whiskers" << ... and a lot more reports decribing the same. Interesting are the two Westinghouse reports: # diode lead as base of a whisker # mechanical part of a potentiometer The link >> Patriot Missile: Anoplate WWW Site: Suspected tin whisker related problems (Fall 2000) << gives explanations under which conditions tin whiskers will grow and this is due to my knowledge as well. Tin covered mechanical parts will be able to produce tin whiskers if mechanical stress ist introduced to them. In all those cases the tin cover was made by galvanic processes but not by melting tin on a copper or brass metal sheet. It is also well known, that the risk of tin whiskers out of tin on copper (or alloys containing a high percentage of copper) is much higher than whiskers out of tin on a nickel barrier. It is reported that even out of Sn60Pb40 you may have some tin whiskers if the conditions are given. The only report which not basicly refferes to a mechanical part is one of the two mentioned Westinghouse reports. There the anode lead of a diode was diagnosed to be the root of failure. In this very case it would be interesting to know whether the whiskers have been grown out of the lead at it's bend or not. So in my oppinion the risk of tin whiskers on an printed board assembly with electronic components (not regarding electromechanical parts !) is quite low, especially when produced using reflow soldering. Then most of the stress on components leads and the tin coverage - if there has been some stress - will be removed. And the copper lines on the board themselves normally cannot be mechanically stressed. An additional method to be more aware of tin whiskers is to use gold over Nickel as metal plating on the board - we have experience with this for about 15 years and thousands of boards with very good results. I would like to know what's your thinking on the points mentioned before. Regards Wolf-Dieter Schmidt Industrial Engineering ----------------------------------------------------------- THALES Defence Deutschland GmbH Land & Joint Systems Ostendstrasse 3 D-75175 Pforzheim - Germany ----------------------------------------------------------- Phone: +49 7231 15 3386 Fax: +49 7231 15 3390 mailto: wolf-dieter.schmidt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://www.thalesgroup.com ******************************************************* From: Richard.Stadem@xxxxxxxxxx Wolf, I would caution you not to downplay the tin whisker issue. I am a consulting engineer, and a very busy one. Right now a lot of my time away from GD is working tin-whisker issues. Although most of those I see are on lead-free product, they are showing up on leaded products as well, typically at the portion of the termination where the leaded solder stops and the tin-plated area begins. It is nearly impossible to completely coat 100% of the tin-finished RoHS-compliant leads with tin-lead solder. Often it is simply not feasible without automating the process, and as a result there are many instances where the tin-finished portion of the lead is exposed near the component body, and that is where I am continually seeing the tin whisker growth on RoHS-compliant parts. Behind the few articles published are many more cases of tin whiskers that never go public. The issue is such that many military, automotive, avionics, and high-reliability companies are investing in fully automatic robotic tinning cells such as those manufactured by V-Tek or Corfin to automatically dip all of their component leads in Sn63Pb37 solder prior to assembly and soldering. Other mitigation methods have not proven to work very well, including conformal coating. Many of the assemblies with whiskers are on ENIG-finished PWBs. I don't see how the plating finish works as a mitigation scheme, except possibly with HASL finishes where the HASL is tin/lead. The few microinches of gold in the solder volume are not enough to present any effective mitigation up around the top of the fillet. The last thing I would recommend to anyone is to switch to ENIG. That is simply switching from one set of problems to another. ****************************************** From: SGregory@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Hi Wolf! I don't have any direct experience with tin whisker failures, but as a production engineer for an EMS company, I wouldn't really know of any failure unless one of our customers told us about it. We just build things and ship them. We don't follow the product through their lives like our customers do. We also don't build that much lead-free here, but we have the capability (dual wave solder pots etc.), and it's just because of our customer base. Most of our customers are either high-rel or military, and forbid tin plated components. Another link that talks about more than just relay whiskers is from CALCE: http://www.calce.umd.edu/lead-free/tin-whiskers/TINWHISKERFAILURES.pdf Steve **************************************************** From: Richard.Stadem@xxxxxxxxxx Steve, I am sending you a couple of pictures via a separate email of recent (last week) tin whiskers seen on a RoHS I.C. on lead-free product, if you could be so kind as to post them on your website. This is just one example, I have lots more. The point I am trying to make is that the whisker issues are becoming widespread, and will eventually carry over into more COTS parts used in high-rel applications. *********************************************** From: CNJ@xxxxxxxxxxx Richard - You might like to submit the/a picture(s) to the NPL defect data base http://defectsdatabase.npl.co.uk/ as they currently only have one picture it would appear. ************************************************ From: jrbarnes@xxxxxxxxx Wolf-Dieter, I have been studying lead-free electronics, the RoHS and WEEE Directives, and the like since December 2004, and have already collected over 12,000 published documents on these subjects, including: * 235 books. * Over 100 Ph. D. and Master's Theses. * Over 11,650 reports, papers, magazine articles, etc. * Over 240 web pages. My bibliography of these materials is at http://www.dbicorporation.com/rohsbib.htm and is some 800 pages long.... To date, I have found *two* documented cases of tin whiskers growing on tin-lead solders or platings: * http://nepp.nasa.gov/whisker/photos/pom/2003dec.htm * Liang, J., Dariavach, N., and Shangguan, D., "Tin Whisker Nucleation and Growth on Sn-Pb Eutectic Coating Layer Inside Plated Through Holes With Press-Fit Pins," IEEE Transactions on Components and Packaging Technologies, vol. 31 no. 1, pp. 152-158, Mar. 2008. I have collected well over 1,000 documents that discuss the growth of tin-whiskers on lead-free solders and platings. These include many cases where unused components are fine, but the same components soldered to printed circuit boards will grow tin whiskers. I personally do not trust the quality, reliability, or longevity of lead-free electronics, because of: * Tin whiskers. * Tin pest (tin plague, tin leprosy. tin disease, tin blight). * Broken solder joints from physical shock. * Kirkendall voids. * Conductive anodic filaments (CAF). * Copper dissolution. Before 2006, I would buy electrical and electronic equipment/products expecting to use them for 3 to 20+ years. But now I buy new electronics-- manufactured since early 2006-- only if I figure that I will recover their total purchase price within 3 months. I also take these precautions: * Plug lead-free (or suspected lead-free) electronics into AC power only when someone will be in the area. * Put batteries into battery-powered lead-free (or suspected lead-free) electronics just before using the item, and remove the batteries as soon as I finish. I may be in trouble when my wristwatch quits... John Barnes KS4GL, PE, NCE, NCT, ESDC Eng, ESDC Tech, PSE, SM IEEE author of Robust Electronic Design Reference Book, Volumes I & II dBi Corporation http://www.dbicorporation.com/ ********************************************* From: Chris.Hunt@xxxxxxxxx Thanks for this, and please use the data base, any problems, let me know Chris Hunt NPL *********************************************** From: SGregory@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Hi Richard! Have your pictures posted now. Go to: http://stevezeva.homestead.com/Whiskers.jpg http://stevezeva.homestead.com/Whiskers_2.jpg SCAREY STUFF! Steve ********************************************* From: gherzog@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Richard, I've just seen your two "whiskers" pictures. The brilliance and smoothness of the leads tends to convince me that this is a bright tin plated lead - not matte tin. Supposedly, bright tin has more organic material in it that promotes whiskers. Glen *********************************************** From: Richard.Stadem@xxxxxxxxxx Done. Thanks. They want all pictures/information on tin whiskers and other issues as well, but be sure to specify what type of process was used, etc. ************************************************ From: Richard.Stadem@xxxxxxxxxx You could be right. I cannot vouch for the finish, only that it is described on the print as matte tin. Nowadays, who knows where the part came from, and what finish was really used? ********************************************** From: Chuck.Patten@xxxxxxxxxxxxx You might also be interested in this link http://nepp.nasa.gov/whisker/failures/ cheers, chuck... ********************************************** From: john@xxxxxxxxxxx The finish after reflow may be academic Tin melts at 231.93 Centigrade John Burke (408) 515 4992 *********************************************** ________________________________ Wondering what's for Dinner Tonight? Get new twists on family favorites at AOL Food <http://food.aol.com/dinner-tonight?NCID=aolfod00030000000001> .