[THIN] Re: process
- From: Dan Dill <DanD@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2011 08:47:02 -0700
It seems like that would be bad to do to a process and that you're trying to
compensate on an OS level when really the program should just be written better
(or how you wish it was).
You could write a script that ran occasionally and killed certain processes
that had a given name and were above x amount of memory, but again, that
wouldn't be nice to your users/programs.
Or throw more memory at your farm? Hardware is pretty cheap these days...
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
david
Sent: Wednesday, October 05, 2011 8:25 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] process
Hi List,
does anybody knows if it's posible to limit the amount of memory of a process,
such as 'iexplore.exe'?
Is there any way to stop the process at a point where it reached xxx Mb of
memory per user?
Sometimes if a process like internet explorer is opened in the morning and user
doesn't use in many hours this process take a lot of memory.
Is it posible to avoid this?
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
//www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************
************************************************
For Archives, RSS, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
//www.freelists.org/list/thin
************************************************
Other related posts:
