It would depend on the apps that will be run. If the apps are disk-intensive and performance is the main goal, then option b is the way to go. Personally, I'd rather sacrifice a bit or performance and have the peace of mind that the server is less likely to croak if a drive fails, so I would almost invariably choose option a. -Jeff > -----Original Message----- > From: Charles Morrall [mailto:Charles.Morrall@xxxxxxxxxx] > Sent: Wednesday, December 11, 2002 3:59 PM > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [THIN] mini-poll: mirrored disk or page file on a seperate > disk? > > > I'm semi-involved in a project where we are looking at > deploying a fairly large farm (approx 30 servers) using blade > servers. Each blade only has place for 2 drives, and we're > not going to SAN attach them. > In this situation would you: > a) mirror two drives and place everything on this mirror set? > b) not mirror them and place the page file on it's own drive? > > Option a is obviously for a bit more redundancy, option b is > for performance. Dual CPU blades with 2 or 4 GB RAM. > > /charles > > *********************************************** > This Weeks Sponsor: triCerat Inc. > triCerat introduces RegSet. Registry > Administration Simplified. > http://www.triCerat.com > ************************************************ > For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or > set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link. > > http://thethin.net/citrixlist.cfm > *********************************************** This Weeks Sponsor: triCerat Inc. triCerat introduces RegSet. Registry Administration Simplified. http://www.triCerat.com ************************************************ For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link. http://thethin.net/citrixlist.cfm