[THIN] Re: if you could only choose one...
- From: "Wilson, Christopher" <CMWilson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:52:37 -0500
I said "pick one" :-)
Honestly I've had pretty lackluster results with virtualizing Citrix
servers. Not too excited on that prospect presently.
________________________________
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Nick Smith
Sent: Wednesday, August 19, 2009 11:16 AM
To: 'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
Subject: [THIN] Re: if you could only choose one...
32-bits VMs and App-V. Gives you both, in effect.
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Wilson, Christopher
Sent: 19 August 2009 17:09
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] if you could only choose one...
Windows 2008 R2 is 64-bit only. App-V is 32-bit only (presently). If
you had to pick one which would it be - 64-bit arch or app
virtualization? (and why?)
64bit means more memory and more users per server, but possibly some
compatibility issues
App-V means less app conflicts and hence less silos, but 32 bit only.
I'm planning for a Citrix farm upgrade and curious about your thoughts.
________________________________
SUBJECT TO CONTRACT
Other related posts:
