I guess I should explain more, if we were to go with Blades in this decision, it would just be that we would use the Blades to REPLACE the DL360's, and then we would use the DL360's for different applications, so it's not like I would get 4-6 Blades on top of what I already have for Citrix... -----Original Message----- From: Evan Mann [mailto:emann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 11:24 AM To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [THIN] Re: blades versus VMWARE Given the choice, I'd rather have more physical units then more virtual units on less physical machines. But this thinking would go along with you actually needing more capacity over cheaper DR/test environments. If you have good capacity and room to grow with your current setup, then perhaps VMWare would be better because it will give you cheaper DR/test environments. -----Original Message----- From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Luchette, Jon Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 11:20 AM To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [THIN] blades versus VMWARE Just wanted to get a discussion going on a decision that I am trying to tackle in terms of MF... Right now our environment looks like this: seven MF servers running MF XP FR3 on Windows 2k Server sp4, 2 NFuse servers also with CSG installed on both running Win2k Advanced Server sp4, and all servers are Compaq DL 360's (some G1, some G2) with dual 1ghz processors and 2gb RAM, we have a SAN now (HP EVA 5000) but are not currently housing any MF data on it.=20 =20 Ideally we would be able to install MF on some new blade servers, house the data on the SAN, and utilize VMWARE as well. That is not going to happen here, we just don't have the money for it. However, we may have the money for either one OR the other. All things considered in terms of MF in particular, which one would you rather have in your data center and why? I know they do different things, but when you match those things up against one another, which one has more advantages?=20 =20 /jL =20 ******************************************************** This week's sponsor - Neoware Thin Clients Neoware makes computing open, secure, reliable, affordable, manageable and obsolete-free.=20 Starting at $199!=20 http://www.neoware.com ********************************************************** Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at: http://thin.net/links.cfm *********************************************************** For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm ******************************************************** This week's sponsor - Neoware Thin Clients Neoware makes computing open, secure, reliable, affordable, manageable and obsolete-free. Starting at $199! http://www.neoware.com ********************************************************** Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at: http://thin.net/links.cfm *********************************************************** For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm ******************************************************** This week's sponsor - Neoware Thin Clients Neoware makes computing open, secure, reliable, affordable, manageable and obsolete-free. Starting at $199! http://www.neoware.com ********************************************************** Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at: http://thin.net/links.cfm *********************************************************** For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link: http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm