[THIN] Re: attention active directory design gurus..again
- From: "Braebaum, Neil" <Neil.Braebaum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2003 11:24:45 +0100
Again, I've gotta ask - why a different forest - I'm truly struggling to
understand that, given all that you've said, so far.
Neil
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian Lilley [mailto:Brian.Lilley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 17 September 2003 10:45
> To: 'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> Subject: [THIN] Re: attention active directory design gurus..again
>
> Hi Neil,
> My apologies, I probably wasn't as clear as I should be. We
> will actually be trashing the forst and moving the Citrix
> servers into the existing Forest.
>
> I totally agree with your comments.
>
> Once again, many thanks for your assistance.
>
> Brianos
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Braebaum, Neil [mailto:Neil.Braebaum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: 17 September 2003 10:13
> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [THIN] Re: attention active directory design gurus..again
>
>
> Traditional reasons for needing a separate forest, being that
> it needs a different schema - outside of that, I think you
> are making your life more difficult that it needs to be.
> Trying to integrate a separate forest, isn't exactly the
> easiest thing, once you've decided to consolidate.
>
> Why not simply a different domain? And does it even need to
> be a separate domain?
>
> If it does *truly* need to be either a different forest,
> domain, or merely OU structure - evaluate the technical
> criteria by which you would choose to implement a separate
> construct - and if it doesn't meet that, then don't do it.
>
> Neil
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Brian Lilley [mailto:Brian.Lilley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > Sent: 17 September 2003 10:04
> > To: 'thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'
> > Subject: [THIN] Re: attention active directory design gurus..again
> >
> > We are installing a pilot project for the Police. There are
> > a number of drivers behind it. We wanted to build the
> > network remotely and then just bolt it on for the duration of
> > the pilot and then rip it out again. The plan is that we
> > will integrate into their forest after the pilot... hoorah I
> > can feel a contract extension coming on...
***********************************************
This e-mail and its attachments are confidential
and are intended for the above named recipient
only. If this has come to you in error, please
notify the sender immediately and delete this
e-mail from your system.
You must take no action based on this, nor must
you copy or disclose it or any part of its contents
to any person or organisation.
Statements and opinions contained in this email may
not necessarily represent those of Littlewoods.
Please note that e-mail communications may be monitored.
The registered office of Littlewoods Limited and its
subsidiaries is 100 Old Hall Street, Liverpool, L70 1AB.
Registered number of Littlewoods Limited is 262152.
************************************************
********************************************************
This Week's Sponsor: ThinPrint
http://www.thinprint.com
**********************************************************
Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at:
http://thethin.net/links.cfm
For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://thethin.net/citrixlist.cfm
Other related posts:
