[THIN] Re: Xerox Phaser 4400

  • From: "Rick Mack" <Rick.Mack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 10 Mar 2005 21:54:08 +1000

Hi Steve,
 
You didn't state whether its Windows 2000 or 2003. But native drivers are 
generally a first choice, followed by aliases and UPDI/II. If it's Windows 
2000, then replacing the 2000 UPDII with the 2003 drivers makes for 
significantly smaller print jobs. But if you're really serious then thinprint, 
simplify printing, EOL universal printer etc are much better.
 
However you can improve 200 prinitng options a lot by using native 2003 drivers 
since 2000 and XP/2003 all use the same printer mechanism. You can port any 
2003 native driver to 2000 without too much hassle.
 
Traditionally the Phasers have had quite good drivers (I'm still in love with 
the Phaser 850 [then tektronix]). However with Xerox it depends on where the 
printer comes from. If it's from Japan, the drivers are third-party and 
sometimes dodgy, if from the US the drivers are generally okay. Always provided 
they really are version 3 (non-kernel mode) drivers of course.
 
You can get a reasonable idea of the stability of a printer driver by creating 
a local port to NUL: and attaching the printer to that port. Let's you test 
"print" hundreds of pages/documents without killing a single tree.
 
regards,
 
Rick
 
Ulrich Mack 
Volante Systems 


________________________________

From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx on behalf of Steve Parr
Sent: Wed 9/03/2005 11:19 PM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Xerox Phaser 4400



Has anyone successfully used the native drivers successfully with XP FR3? Am 
mapping HP drivers instead at moment but users want some advanced functionality 
that may only work if it seems if you use the native drivers - the usual trade 
off between functionality and stability.
Will version 3 Xerox Phaser 44OO drivers be stable?
  
********************************************************
This Weeks Sponsor: RTO Software TScale
TScale provides a cost-effective way to improve performance, capacity and 
stability for thin-client servers like Citrix MetaFrame or Microsoft Terminal 
Services running Windows NT, 2000 or 2003.
http://www.rtosoft.com/enter.asp?id=296
**********************************************************
Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at:
http://thin.net/links.cfm
ThinWiki community - Excellent SBC Search Capabilities!
http://www.thinwiki.com
***********************************************************
For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm



#####################################################################################
This e-mail, including all attachments, may be confidential or privileged.  
Confidentiality or privilege is not waived or lost because this e-mail has been 
sent to you in error.  If you are not the intended recipient any use, 
disclosure or copying of this e-mail is prohibited.  If you have received it in 
error please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and destroy all 
copies of this e-mail and any attachments.  All liability for direct and 
indirect loss arising from this e-mail and any attachments is hereby disclaimed 
to the extent permitted by law.
#####################################################################################

Other related posts: