[THIN] Re: XenApp EOL Dates?
- From: Jan <tinybeetle@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2013 15:30:45 -0400
I still have 4.0 in production, and don't care one bit if they support it
or not. If it ain't broke, don't fix it.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Jeff D <jdspambox2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Anyone plan to still have production 4.5 or 5.0 in place after the
> deadline? Anyone considering the extended support?
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Dogers <dogers@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Hmm, fair enough! It's just that a few of us were sure it said 2014..
>> It's not that important that we'd want to spend 100k :)
>>
>> Andrew
>> On 25 Mar 2013 15:09, "Dan Dillman" <dan@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>>> Correct, I worked at Citrix as an SE until going on my own in January
>>> and this has been the EOL date for over a year. My customers complained
>>> the entire time :). Everyone assumed it would follow the OS timeline. You
>>> can buy extended support from Citrix but it is 100k for 6 months. That can
>>> get you another year for 200k. Not cheap by any means but depends on your
>>> needs.
>>> Dan Dillman
>>> Applications2U
>>> A2U.net
>>> Dan@xxxxxxx
>>>
>>> Sent from my Windows Phone
>>> ------------------------------
>>> From: Webster <webster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Sent: 3/25/2013 8:23 AM
>>> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: [THIN] Re: XenApp EOL Dates?
>>>
>>> It is has been 31-mar-2013 for quite some time for the 2003 version.
>>> The 2008 version is EOL 13-jan-2015.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> http://support.citrix.com/article/CTX122442
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Webster
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
>>> Behalf Of *Dogers
>>> *Sent:* Monday, March 25, 2013 5:31 AM
>>> *To:* Thin List
>>> *Subject:* [THIN] XenApp EOL Dates?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Just had a notification through from Citrix stating that XenApp 5 is
>>> going EOL in a week!?
>>>
>>> There are a number of us here who swear that this used to be 2014, not
>>> next week! Has anyone else seen this?
>>>
>>> And yes, I know we obviously need to make the jump. We're under way
>>> testing apps but thought we had another year..
>>>
>>> Andrew
>>>
>>
>
Other related posts:
