[THIN] Re: XenApp 5 - 2008 x64 Slow
- From: Andy Friar <Andy.Friar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: "thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 6 Jan 2011 15:40:24 +0000
Intel L5520 2.27Ghz
Rgds
Andy
_NT
________________________________
________________________________
________________________________
[cid:novusgrouplogo4a7d.jpg]
Andy Friar
Technical Consultant
T
01260 292500
M 07720 470551
F 01260 292505
E Andy.Friar@xxxxxxxxxxx
Novus Networks Ltd
The Old Corn Mill
Congleton Road
Siddington
Macclesfield
SK11 9JR
The information in this E-Mail is intended for the named recipients only. It
may contain privileged and confidential information. If you are not the
intended recipient you must not copy, distribute or take any action or place
reliance on it. If you have received this E-Mail in error, please notify the
sender immediately by using the E-Mail address and then delete the message. The
views expressed in this message are personal and not necessarily those of Novus
Networks. Company Reg No 3858005
Disclaimer added by CodeTwo Exchange Rules 2010
www.codetwo.com<http://www.codetwo.com>
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Webster
Sent: 06 January 2011 15:30
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: XenApp 5 - 2008 x64 Slow
You talking about this:
http://blogs.technet.com/b/perfguru/archive/2008/02/18/explanation-for-the-usepmtimer-switch-in-the-boot-ini.aspx
Webster
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Steve Snyder
Subject: [THIN] Re: XenApp 5 - 2008 x64 Slow
what CPUs? I had a similar issue with W2K3 x64 and the AMD Opteron - was a
boot.ini flag that cured it. Not sure is w2k8 has a similar issue/cure esp.
since it uses BCD
Other related posts:
