[THIN] Re: XA 6.5 with Receiver 4.1 for Start Menu Shortcut management?

  • From: Webster <webster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2014 20:25:59 +0000

?"Everyone else" is NOT using SF.  There are a LOT of people still using Web 
Interface because for many large enterprises, SF is just not ready to leave the 
minor leagues yet.  Plus, they still like icons on the desktop.



Webster

________________________________
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx <thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Paul 
Aljets <paljets@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 12:52 PM
To: Thin
Subject: [THIN] Re: XA 6.5 with Receiver 4.1 for Start Menu Shortcut management?

Everyone else is using Storefront and forgoing the icons on the desktop :(

--paul
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
James Scanlon
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 11:44 AM
To: Thin
Subject: [THIN] XA 6.5 with Receiver 4.1 for Start Menu Shortcut management?

I was hoping to have XenApp 6.5 with Receiver 4.1.
Receiver 4.1 is slow as hell, takes forever to open, forever to login, forever 
to publish shortcuts.
Is this the best way to manage start menu shortucts for XenApp 6.5?
Ive gone through all the optimisations for storefront 2.1 on Windows 2008 r2, 
and its still sucks.
All we want is a PNAgent like shortcut management for the start menu, thats 
speedy and quick.

Whats everyone else doing these days?

scanjam! :)

Other related posts: