[THIN] Re: Windows 2000 and Windows 2003
- From: "Jonathan Kadoo" <jkadoo@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2008 22:11:18 -0400
That is great, thanks everyone for your help.
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Russell Robertson <
russell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Jonathon
>
>
>
> Would I be right in thinking that your TS license server is on a DC (since
> it's a 2000 license server)? You might want to move it and therefore
> re-activate the license server, but other than that, it should be fine. If
> your Citrix servers remain on 2000 server, moving to 2003 AD doesn't change
> the licensing. A 2003 license server can issue TS CALS to a 2000 server.
>
>
>
> Hope this helps.
>
>
>
> Cheers
>
>
>
> Russell
>
> *Russell Robertson* | Virtual Stream | T:01224 580970 | M:07881 922 745 |
> Microsoft, Citrix and VMware advisers |
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
> Behalf Of *Jonathan Kadoo
> *Sent:* 01 April 2008 14:14
> *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> *Subject:* [THIN] Re: Windows 2000 and Windows 2003
>
>
>
> I am just worried about the TS licensing. Any issues with that in a W2k3
> domain?
>
> Jonathan
>
> On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:59 AM, Rick Mack <ulrich.mack@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Jonathan,
>
>
>
> Shouldn't be a problem provided Win2K is patched to a reasonable level.
>
>
>
> regards,
>
>
>
> Rick
>
>
>
> --
> Ulrich Mack
> Quest Software
> Provision Networks Division
>
>
>
> On 4/1/08, *Jonathan Kadoo* <jkadoo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Good morning everyone, I have a client that is in a bit of a pickle. They
> are currently running Windows 2000 AD and 5 - Windows 2000 Citrix servers
> running Metaframe 1.8a. They know they need to upgrade their
> infrastructure. The question is can we upgrade the active directory domain
> to 2003 r2 and still maintain the citrix servers as they are? Somehow I
> don't think we can do this. Any thoughts or ideas would be greatly
> appreciated.
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
