[THIN] Re: WANScaler vs NetScaler

  • From: "Jon Luchette" <jon.e.luchette@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2007 08:45:54 -0400

Would it make sense to use Netscaler to load balance 2 Web servers running
CSG and WI on each?  If I did this, would I get the benefits of the load
balancing plus the performance benefits?

On 6/27/07, Steve Greenberg <steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

 WANScaler optimizes communication between two network points through
caching, compression and TCP optimization. It can improve choppy network
response and does wonders for file transfers, especially and repetitive
transfers



Netscaler does almost too much to summarize. But basically it is a
fantastic load balancing/web optimization device that has great performance
and redundancy. It can do magic as a general purpose load balancer and
especially in front of a web farm of servers through caching and off loading
tasks from the web servers. It is also an enterprise class SSL VPN, it has
an application firewall and now can act as the AAC server in a Citrix farm.
It goes deeper and further, but that is the overview….



Steve Greenberg

Thin Client Computing

34522 N. Scottsdale Rd D8453

Scottsdale, AZ 85262

(602) 432-8649

www.thinclient.net

steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx


 ------------------------------

*From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On
Behalf Of *Jon Luchette
*Sent:* Wednesday, June 27, 2007 12:30 PM
*To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
*Subject:* [THIN] WANScaler vs NetScaler



Can somebody give me a quick breakdown of what the differences are between
wanscaler and netscaler and what they are used for?



Thanks!





Other related posts: