Yes ESX 3.0 is better but it still is not there yet either. This is coming from some experts that I trust on this subject above anyone else.
Jeff Pitsch Microsoft MVP - Terminal Server
Forums not enough? Get support from the experts at your business http://jeffpitschconsulting.com
I used to think so, but with ESX 3.0 built specially for Citrix support, and the larger hardware (ours are on DL385 Dual/Dual, with 6-16GB ram), we are able to handle some pretty intensive applications to date.
------------------------------
*From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Jeff Pitsch *Sent:* Monday, July 31, 2006 12:29 PM
*To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx *Subject:* [THIN] Re: VMWare Farm
I believe the general concesus is is that for production, VM's are not the way. Lightly used servers are fine, but for an entire farm the performance is ismply not there yet.
Jeff Pitsch Microsoft MVP - Terminal Server
Forums not enough? Get support from the experts at your business http://jeffpitschconsulting.com
On 7/31/06, *Eldon* <u2htdaab@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Currently running FR3 on 2000 SP4, and am beginning to evaluate and look at building a separate Windows 2003 CPS 4.0 Farm on the VMWare ESX platform. Just wanted to get an idea if anyone on the list has something similar in production today, what hardware you deployed to support published apps on ESX and VMotion, and how you designed your farm (including Data Collector and Database). Also looking for Best Practices and Things to Avoid!
Thanks!!