[THIN] Re: VMWare
- From: Jeff Pitsch <jepitsch@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 09:29:09 -0400
ESX will always have better performance than GSX because ESX is tied more
closesly to the linux kernel. GSX is strictly a service and doesn't tie
deeply into the OS at all.
Jeff
On 10/28/05, Jon D <rekcahpmip@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I run citrix in VMware GSX, and I have an identical physical citrix box.
> Both production.
> I wish I would have put it in ESX with SMP because the citrix box can
> only use 1 processor which isnt good(even with GSX dual processor license).
> I would say VMWare burns 20-30% of the resources(the physical can
> probably handle 20-30% more connections).
> The performance problems I see is the physical disk, and mainly the
> processor. 1 3Ghz processor is only good for maybe 23-25 processes.
> Overall I do like it though. If my manager messes up the virtual citrix
> server I just revert it to the last snapshot and its fixed. If he messes up
> the physical one, I've got a a solid week of redoing it ahead of me.
> -Jon-
> .
>
Other related posts:
