[THIN] Re: VDI - Windows 7
- From: scott.delagrange@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 13:37:12 -0400
My experiences with Win7 so far have been much more favorable than Vista.
I currently have it loaded on an old 1.0 GHz celeron laptop with only 512
meg of RAM and it's actually usable. It may not be fast but it is faster
than my wife's newer laptop (not exactly sure of GHz ) that has 2 gig of
ram. Even after removing most of the crap the vendor preloads on the
laptops, hers still consumes over a gig just booting up while the Win7 one
is sitting at a little over 300 meg.
Regards,
Scott DeLagrange
CIBA VISION Corporation
IT Global Supply Chain Applications
CIBA VISION Corporation
11460 Johns Creek Parkway
Johns Creek, GA 30097
"Doug Rooney" <Doug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
07/28/2009 01:21 PM
Please respond to
thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
To
<thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
cc
Subject
[THIN] Re: VDI - Windows 7
?Bells and Whistles? this that MS speak for crap and sludge?
Thank You
~Doug Rooney
Sonoma Tilemakers
IT Manager
7750 Bell Rd.
Windsor Ca, 95492
(707) 837-8177 X211
(707) 837-9472 FAX
it@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Jim Kenzig
Sent: Tuesday, July 28, 2009 9:23 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: VDI - Windows 7
Bad news, Windows 7 is basically Vista with more bells and Whistles.
Jim Kenzig
Blog: http://www.techblink.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/kenzig
On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:48 AM, Nick Smith <nick@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
One of the things holding us back from a full-throated VDI deployment was
a feeling that if we deployed XP we were going to be investing in a
?moving-towards-redundant? way, while if we deployed Vista virtual PCs our
available RAM was going to vanish fast.
Has anyone started deploying Windows 7 in either test or production?
Error! Filename not specified.
SUBJECT TO CONTRACT
Other related posts:
