[THIN] Re: USB device control software

  • From: "Rankin, James R" <kz20fl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 16:35:52 +0000

We're after something a bit more granular than what the GPO setting offers, 


-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Kenzig <jkenzig@xxxxxxxxx>
Sender: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 11:55:45 
To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: USB device control software

*Isnt there a GPO that blocks USB?
*Jim Kenzig
web: http://www.kenzig.com*
*Facebook: **http://www.facebook.com/kenzig*<http://www.facebook.com/kenzig>
*Twitter: **http://twitter.com/kenzig* <http://twitter.com/kenzig>

On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 9:07 AM, James Rankin <kz20fl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Apologies if you've already seen me whining about this on Twitter, but is
> anyone aware of any USB device control software that works with
> Provisioning Services 6.0, XenApp 6.5 and Windows Server 2008 R2? Ideally
> it needs to support encryption too.
> Cheers,
> JR
> --
> http://appsensebigot.blogspot.co.uk
> I certainly don't have time to monitor the content of e-mail sent and
> received via this account for the purposes of ensuring compliance with
> anyone's policies and procedures. I am pretty sure that somewhere in UK
> legislation there is some politically-correct drivel that stipulates I must
> never send or store e-mails or attachments that are obscene, indecent,
> sexist, racist, defamatory, abusive, in breach of copyright, encrypted,
> amusing, overly long, slightly opinionated, anonymous, likely to harm
> animals or hurt the feelings of an as-yet-unspecified or as-yet-nonexistent
> minority (such as extraterrestrial eggplants). Emails of this nature sent
> in or out of this account may be intercepted and stopped by the system, but
> it's a long shot. This being the UK, even if I was prosecuted for breach of
> said email guidelines, I'd probably walk with a suspended sentence anyway,
> but if I'd forgotten to pay my car insurance, I'd most certainly be hung,
> drawn and quartered.
> I am not responsible for any changes made to the message after it has been
> sent, in more or less the same way that cyclozine manufacturers aren't
> responsible for drug addicts mixing it with methadone and overdosing, so
> I'm glad I cleared the confusion up there nice and early. Where opinions
> are expressed, they are not necessarily mine. However, I don't make a habit
> of expressing other people's opinions for them, so you shouldn't take that
> statement as an indication that I am in the business of providing an
> opinion-expressing service. In the event that I did, this discourse would
> provide no guarantee that I would do it anyway, but I don't, so I won't.
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and
> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are
> addressed. If you are not the intended addressee, or the person responsible
> for delivering it to them, aside from the fact that you've clearly got some
> level of unauthorised access to their account or are at least engaged in
> some sort of fraud, I'm obliged to tell you that may not copy, forward
> disclose or otherwise use it or any part of it in any way. To do so may be
> unlawful, and as you're already breaking the law, I am sure that bombshell
> makes you quake in your boots and turn yourself over to law enforcement
> immediately. If you receive this e-mail by mistake, please advise the
> sender immediately. That would be me, and as I am clearly prone to sending
> emails to completely the wrong person, I should instantly be stripped of my
> status as a technical consultant and sent to do something more becoming of
> my stupidity, such as appearing on Big Brother, the X Factor or "insert
> country name here"'s Got Talent.

Other related posts: