[THIN] Re: USB device control software

  • From: Magnus Hjorleifsson <magnus@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: "thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 09:37:55 -0400

Symantec makes a good one that we use for AV, USB device control and encryption 

Sent from my iPhone

On Apr 26, 2012, at 9:07, James Rankin <kz20fl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Apologies if you've already seen me whining about this on Twitter, but is 
> anyone aware of any USB device control software that works with Provisioning 
> Services 6.0, XenApp 6.5 and Windows Server 2008 R2? Ideally it needs to 
> support encryption too.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> 
> 
> 
> JR
> 
> -- 
> http://appsensebigot.blogspot.co.uk
> 
> IMPORTANT INFORMATION/DISCLAIMER
> 
> I certainly don't have time to monitor the content of e-mail sent and 
> received via this account for the purposes of ensuring compliance with 
> anyone's policies and procedures. I am pretty sure that somewhere in UK 
> legislation there is some politically-correct drivel that stipulates I must 
> never send or store e-mails or attachments that are obscene, indecent, 
> sexist, racist, defamatory, abusive, in breach of copyright, encrypted, 
> amusing, overly long, slightly opinionated, anonymous, likely to harm animals 
> or hurt the feelings of an as-yet-unspecified or as-yet-nonexistent minority 
> (such as extraterrestrial eggplants). Emails of this nature sent in or out of 
> this account may be intercepted and stopped by the system, but it's a long 
> shot. This being the UK, even if I was prosecuted for breach of said email 
> guidelines, I'd probably walk with a suspended sentence anyway, but if I'd 
> forgotten to pay my car insurance, I'd most certainly be hung, drawn and 
> quartered.
> 
> I am not responsible for any changes made to the message after it has been 
> sent, in more or less the same way that cyclozine manufacturers aren't 
> responsible for drug addicts mixing it with methadone and overdosing, so I'm 
> glad I cleared the confusion up there nice and early. Where opinions are 
> expressed, they are not necessarily mine. However, I don't make a habit of 
> expressing other people's opinions for them, so you shouldn't take that 
> statement as an indication that I am in the business of providing an 
> opinion-expressing service. In the event that I did, this discourse would 
> provide no guarantee that I would do it anyway, but I don't, so I won't.
> 
> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended 
> solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If 
> you are not the intended addressee, or the person responsible for delivering 
> it to them, aside from the fact that you've clearly got some level of 
> unauthorised access to their account or are at least engaged in some sort of 
> fraud, I'm obliged to tell you that may not copy, forward disclose or 
> otherwise use it or any part of it in any way. To do so may be unlawful, and 
> as you're already breaking the law, I am sure that bombshell makes you quake 
> in your boots and turn yourself over to law enforcement immediately. If you 
> receive this e-mail by mistake, please advise the sender immediately. That 
> would be me, and as I am clearly prone to sending emails to completely the 
> wrong person, I should instantly be stripped of my status as a technical 
> consultant and sent to do something more becoming of my stupidity, such as 
> appearing on Big Brother, the X Factor or "insert country name here"'s Got 
> Talent.
> 

Other related posts: