Currently we ONLY use WI / CSG and doesn't PN agent require more open ports on the firewall? Currently we ONLY allow 80/443 traffic except for some specific FTP and other specialized programs and we lock those to specific addresses. To enable this I'd have to argue a case to open up our firewall even further. CSG/WI would be useful if worked. On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 1:00 PM, Andrew Wood <andrew.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote: > Erm – why would you want that? > > > > Your delivery mechanism for pnagent is essentially the same as WI – so > adding in PNAgent at the backend isn’t going to be a major pain for you. For > your iphone users on the other hand having to enter the WI details every > time is going to be cumbersome – the PNagent model means there’s a lighter > interface to handle; and possibly it was a bit easier to code... > > > > *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On > Behalf Of *Jan > *Sent:* 06 May 2009 15:47 > *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Subject:* [THIN] Re: The Citrix Receiver for iPhone 1.0 in App Store > > > > So will this thing ever work with just plain Web Interface? > > On Tue, May 5, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Andrew Wood <andrew.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > Jinx > > > > ;) > > > > *From:* thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On > Behalf Of *Jim Kenzig http://thin.ms > *Sent:* 05 May 2009 15:31 > *To:* THIN > *Subject:* [THIN] The Citrix Receiver for iPhone 1.0 in App Store > > > > The *Citrix* Receiver for iPhone 1.0 in App Store! http://fleck.com/ykXvG > Jim Kenzig > Blog: http://www.techblink.com > Twitter: http://twitter.com/kenzig > Twitter: http://twitter.com/InternetPilot > > >